this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
519 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
638 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He would be the perfect person to AMA as he’s already associated with Reddit revolts, and it would result in tremendous media coverage and mark fediverse as a viable alternative to Reddit. What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Okay, this brings up a question that's been in the back of my mind. I'm all in on federated communities, but I'm wondering how that architecture supports a massive event. Are there any instances that could support a giant number of concurrent users constantly refreshing a page? How much of the server burden is on the insurance hosting the community, and how much is on the instance that a visiting user is logged into? I'm not sure how it works.

[–] nieceandtows@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That’s a good point. I would think at least Lemmy.world would handle such a load.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Beehaw is also quite well funded atm. Iirc their balance is currently several times their server cost

[–] swab148@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Beehaw has defederated, though, so no one would be able to see that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)