this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

46115 readers
216 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The conversations are amazing

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ubergeek@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It's too bad the people of China aren't allowed to edit Wikipedia, and correct the facts, because of their oppressive state.

[โ€“] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They literally dont care since they have a dozen better alrernatives ๐Ÿ˜‚

[โ€“] ubergeek@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Are they better, though?

I mean, last I checked, Wikipedia is far more accurate than most encyclopedias professionally assembled. And, to add to it: Wikipedia is certainly well sourced, and admits its biases quite openly, and in fact are working to correct those biases.

So, what Chinese-based wikipedia alternatives are out there? And I mean, communally owned, maintained, and edited encyclopedia, which, quite frankly, is one of the best examples of a communist endeavors one can find on the internet at this time...

[โ€“] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, last I checked

Lol, what do you mean "checked"? You're just assuming its accurate based on your pre-existing biases.

[โ€“] ubergeek@lemmy.today 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm assuming it's still as accurate as the data previously showed, and because I'm an active editor there, who works quite hard to ensure what I edit is reliably sourced.

[โ€“] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] ubergeek@lemmy.today 0 points 3 hours ago

If you have evidence of the contrary, I'd be happy to see it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)