Asklemmy

44362 readers

2302 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Would you trust yourself with infinite wealth? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 day ago by atotayo@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Let's say that you have an opportunity to gain billions to fix the society from the top. Do you think that you would keep your integrity and use your money for the greater good, or that you would be corrupted by your power?

If so, would you still accept the offer knowing that you would just make the situation worse?

And if you believe in yourself, how would you try to convince an hypotetical entity to give you this wealth?

To avoid regrets let's say that if you decline the offer your memory about the deal gets erased.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You also have to win a full billion in the first place, and someone else pointed out the highest winnings are actually juust short. So, technically I was wrong, although the point still stands.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There's been several winning jackpots over a billion now. There was one a couple weeks ago.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

~~Yeah, but apparently they've all been split a few ways.~~

It's a distinction without a difference, but there you go.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you saying the jackpot, or the one time cash out value which is always less than the annuity value? Because those are different things. And there's several jackpot values that were single tickets above 1 bln

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

Ah shit, you're right. I was reading the table wrong.

Okay, so the top one is actually a two billion jackpot that came out to just below a billion due to the way the cash is awarded.