this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43510 readers
1461 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Leaving the thankless task of moderation to free working volunteers entitles them to secrecy and unaccountability.

Moderation should be crowdsourced subscription service that pays at least minimum wage.

User should directly be able to choose which moderation mask they wish to wear and they should pay for it. If not in real money (because fees and regulations) then at least in some form of actually valuable, redeemable token to compensate moderator for their service.

The user should always have the final work on who and what they don't want to see. Which moderator they subscribe.

Moderation must be transparent, modmail must public.

Moderators should not feel entitled to secrecy or abuse of their position (as would be the case for free work)

There would not be systemic power to wield by the moderators as a class, against the user class or the owner class.

It should ould be possible for a moderator to override or cancel the actions of another moderator. And then it comes to the order of operations in your list of moderator subscriptions.

Lemmy communities should publish a default set of moderators, which the user can pick and choose. Moderators should be able to publish multiple "moderation masks" and you pick which you like the most. Example "everything minus spam" "everything minus spam and sex" "everything minus spam and religion" "everything minus spam, racism, kletophobia and Jeff Bezos" and so on

But see, that's putting the user in control of their experience we wouldn't want that ....

load more comments (6 replies)