this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58531 readers
5701 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phx@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

And hopefully something that they'll be able to find reams of prior art that precede the patent

[–] jeff@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Once again. Patents have nothing to do with art. And even if they had proof they worked on those mechanics before Nintendo patented them doesn't mean they have the right to use it. Yes, it's kinda a dumb system. But there is a lot of effort to get a patent, and once you have one you have a lot of protection because of it.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

(Not sure if I'm being whoosh'd, but just in case: "Prior art" is the legal term for a precedent that something was in use prior to being patented, and is the primary means of fighting software patent troll shit like nintendo is trying to pull here)

[–] jeff@programming.dev 0 points 2 weeks ago

Nope, my bad. Im far from an expert but know enough to differential between copyright and parent. I didn't know that prior art had that meaning.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)