this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
2940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (43 children)

Normally I'd say fuck Nintendo but palworld obviously stole the designs and artistic direction for many of their characters.

Most of the pals I saw at first were modified versions of an already existant pokemon with little to seperate it from fan art of that pokemon. This is particularly agregoous as they clashed against the rest of this games aesthetic. Nothing that was original fit with the design of the pokemon rip offs.

Many other games have a pokemon esque aesthetic without direct copying. It looking similar is not my issue. My issue is that while playing I could easily name most pals to a pokemon. Seriously, look up comparisons. It's blatant.

They've moved away from thisbrecently but fuck man if it ain't obvious. If they did the same to some small project I'd assume people would be much more up in arms, rightfully so.

Still though, I won't cry if Nintendo loses. I hope they pay an insane amount in lawyers fees either way and never see a dime out of the case

[–] stormesp@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

For real, its fun to see people shitting on Nintendo on this one, i dislike them as the most, but its absurd here. Pocket Pair just releases copies of other games, they also released a Hollow Knight copy just before Palworld, and on Palworld they almost copied the design 1 to 1 in some creatures. There is a reason you dont see Nintendo suing the other million pokemon clones, which is because they dont went of and almost even used the same geometry for some models. They straight up copied Pokemon like Lucario, Luxray, Cinderace, Cobalion and a bunch of others to the point where people showed their triangles and it was pretty certain they used ripped assets as the base for them.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Copied characters is not what the lawsuit is about. It's like nobody 'defending' the lawsuit has read anything about it.

[–] sit_up_straight@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

you say that like you know what the lawsuit is about, which as far as I've read isn't yet known. copied characters seems most likely since people were talking about it as an issue since the game's launch

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Palworld developer Pocketpair has responded to this morning's dramatic decision by Nintendo to file a patent infringement lawsuit against the company.

First paragraph of the article, dude. Patent infringement is not IP.

[–] sit_up_straight@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

girl, I'm not a lawyer, i don't know the intricacies of IP vs patent law and whether you can patent a character model/design.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

Then why are you trying to say what's going on?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)