this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
36 points (90.9% liked)

World News

32363 readers
303 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] MidwestMayonaiseSalad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

He’s implying a conspiracy theory that war with China has already been decided on.

he’s an idiot.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can't tell if they're implying that the use of the word "predicted" in the article's title is not accurate given the body of the article, which I somewhat agree with, or if they're implying that "predicted" is the wrong tense of the word considering the war hasn't started, or some other reading. That's why I asked them. I'd rather not jump to conclusions.

[–] grizzledgrizzly@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This was my intention. The title is misleading imo.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)