this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59672 readers
2785 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (18 children)

Not until a self driving car can safely handle all manner of edge cases thrown at it, and I don’t see that happening any time soon. The cars would need to be able to recognize situations that may not be explicitly programmed into it, and figure out a safe way to deal with it.

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just like all humans can do right now, right?

I never see any humans on the rode staring at their phone and driving like shit.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The problem with self-driving cars isn't that it's worse than human drivers on average, it's that it's SO INCREDIBLY BAD when it's wrong that no company would ever assume the liability for the worst of its mistakes.

[–] pbbananaman@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

But if the average is better, then we’re will clearly win by using it. I’m not following the logic of tracking the worst case scenarios as opposed to the average.

load more comments (15 replies)