On a local level (in the UK) there are a lot more community and Council groups being setup to try and find solutions I would absolutely recommend attending those.

Other than that, ensure your pension is invested in green and eco investments and try to fly less (maybe even drive less).

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

These sound like good initiatives. I'm not sure it'll be enough, though. The planes for regardless. And public transport is still getting worse – often, driving isn't a choice.

Due to shrinkflation, too, for example, the contents of products have reduced by 10–50% over the last year but the packaging is more or less the same size. So the carbon footprint of consumables is higher than it was, and when it was less it was still higher than it needed to be. The manufacturers simply do not gaf and will undermine any local or individual efforts unless pressure is put on them.

We need to focus our attention, collectively, on the production side of the equation if we want to save the planet in time.

[–] sinkingship@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pension, lol. I don't know how old you are, but I wouldn't count on pension in very few decades.

We would need to do much more than flying less, driving less and invest money. We would need to change the entirety of our lifestyles. And by now we probably need to have luck as well.

[–] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lifestylism is not something that will magically save the planet, there are actors bigger than us and who control more power over the planet then the entire population located on it.

Also flying less and driving less, you can only do that if the infrastructure is built for it. In Europe? Yeah duh, look at Italy it killed domestic flight thanks to trains. But the US? Forget it! Amtrak fucking sucks, and you still have to drive from your suburb to the train station because viable public transport does not, and will not exist there. It's been gutted completely by General Motors who essentialy are defacto the US government. (EDIT: The previous statement is to say that the US does not respond to the needs of it's citizens but to those of capital)

The true enemies of the world are the shareholders willing to kill it for profit, and they have names and adressess. (Side note; do not commit to adventurism)