sith

So I was correct. Thanks!

That's great!

Yeah, maybe that was a bad example. I believe my point is that if the quality of the product and/or the number of users is large enough, it doesn't matter if you don't have a viable business plan yet.

The big risk when it comes to the fediverse is that it still is so small that big tech could just highjack the whole thing, and it wouldn't even be a bullet on the weekly board agenda. I.e. it's still pocket money we're taking about.

Exactly. And there are countless of popular open source projects which are funded by VC. Many of which I have no idea how they plan to make money. Astral (the creator of ruff and uv) is one recent example.

Just say that you use Rust and AI, and the VC will come.

Instead of writing the same answer to all sceptics, I'll just write one answer here:

I believe that you greatly overestimate the rationality of VC at a micro level and greatly underestimate the number of business cases that can be made on top of popular open standards. Developing a fediverse software like Pixelfed is basically free if you're with the big money. The question is if it will hurt your other investments and strategy. Right now it looks like the answer is "no". The risk of putting too many eggs in the oligarch basket seems quite high.

Is it not possible to make money of the internet because you don't own the infrastructure and the standards are open?

How can you make money of the internet if you don't own all infrastructure and control all standards? I promise, there are countless businesses cases.

RTS: Zero-K

RTT: Steel Division 2 and Warno

TBS: Dominions 6. Songs of Conquest if you want a modern casual HOMM3 clone.

TBT: Battle Brothers and Field of Glory 2

Grand Strategy: Basically everything from Paradox. Victoria 3 is my current favorite.

No official Android and iPhone apps => no users.

Facebook has always been removing posts and comments containing links to Fediverse. At least they did a couple of years ago. But it doesn't happen all the time, so there is some kind decision making algorithm.

Didn't get banned, but they marked the post as spam. That was 3 days ago. Maybe they're blocking now as well.

They should've done that years ago. Twitter was a shit show long before Elon took over. And there are barely any normies on X. So public official presence isn't necessary. Neither from a democratic nor an election winning viewpoint.

I was just about to ask something similar. Controversial sorting within a community is clearly broken in its current state. You'll only see ancient posts unless the community is tiny.