Well, not to diss on giving to charity but two technical arguments against. One is, you are acting as an additional tax on the worker (the source of the surplus) and then redirecting that tax to charity. It's fine but the elected government has democratically selected priorities that they can rarely fund so it is better to just give it to the treasury. And 2, just don't collect this tax in the first place, allowing the worker to spend it on the local economy.
primal_buddhist
joined 1 year ago
He know he has your vote and all those obvious urban student academic groups. He wants those thinking about voting Rishi but having doubts to think exactly what you are saying. He is not that left wing, he is a centrist, he will be fine
Only so much the upper chamber can actually do. And we wouldn't want it to actually block things for ever.
Difficult but legally required by them, including establishing your bona fides.