n0xew

joined 1 year ago
[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Oh I got one from when I was a kid: my sibling's friend once valled her an "invertebrate brain". I'm glad she didn't have any vertebrae in there!

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Looks nice, I'll give it a try! There's also a Jellyfin community, don't hesitate to crosspost there :)

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Technically, most people?

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think I saw a few issues about this leak that were not fixed by 10.9.1 so I'd say no. Personally I'm waiting a bit before upgrading

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Yeah this user spammed another topic in the linux community, I was surprised to see a jellyfin topic being spammed too.. That's the price of being a popular software I guess!

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Looks helpful, I'll have to give it a try. Thanks!

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

There hasn't been any release since a year either, the last one being 4.37.5 https://github.com/authelia/authelia/releases

But you can have a look at the github milestones, 4.38.0 is in the work and hopefully will be released sooner than later https://github.com/authelia/authelia/milestone/17

Regarding security: a quick browsing in the project's issues, filtering by area:security did not show any flaws being reported since the last release. But there may have been undisclosed vulnerabilities the project's dev are working on fixing for the next version. My personal non-professional non-legally-binding opinion is that it looks fine, so I do keep it running on my server.

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The original dev has gone silent indeed, but a team of volunteers resumed development recently. So I wouldn't call it outdated, but we'll see if they'll keep up the good work for long.

I've been using it for more than a year to automate a few stuff, it's been good for this purpose so yeah I would recommend it :)

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Windows only but does pack a pretty nice set of features: https://hassagent.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Actually, to make it with cryptographic guarantees is pretty hard... I know of at least one university professor in the PET (Privacy Enhancing Technologies)/cryptography space who spent quite some time on his startup to develop such a search engine. In the end it all fell apart because of one the mathematical assumptions being unprovable. This is just one example but I guess it illustrates pretty well why we've yet to see a cryptographically secure/private search engine as a product!

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Any love for qwant?

[–] n0xew@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Funny, I recently had a similar story at work. We're in a building with several companies, so the "Rolls Royce" guy of your story was someone from another company, and the "Mercedes" guy was one of our colleagues. Exact same thing, the other guy was badly parked whereas our colleague was within the marks (although slightly misaligned TBF, but still in the marks). Some people..

view more: next ›