You

joined 3 months ago
[–] You@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

or something

For Belgium I'd go with the smurfs :D

[–] You@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I feel like we need a map depicting all the places where these superb owl pictures were taken. People on holiday might enjoy taking trips to some locations.

https://www.visitwestvlaanderen.be/en/uitkerkse-polder-walking-route

[–] You@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a real beauty!

[–] You@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah. Hugo again. His skills are impressive. And terrifying.

[–] You@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hi there! I just wanna talk to you about your car's extended warranty!

[–] You@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cassowaries look the part, absolutely! And while they certainly can harm people (and dogs), they seem to do that only if provoked and to protect their young. Same as ostriches, which actually seem to kill more people.

But generally Australian Animals are in a class of their own. If you're looking for a thrill, the magpie swooping season can create memorable encounters.

[–] You@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The Showbill is a good choice!

But I guess they wanted a native bird for authenticity. And who knows if Shoebills are cut out for a life in showbiz.

[–] You@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I love Eulenschwalme (German name of frogmouths - still descriptive but less insulting). I've learned of their existence through an Australian TV series named Golden Pennies where one of the bad guys kept a frogmouth as pet.

And an article called: What Instagram Can Teach Us About Bird Photography: 'The Most Photogenic Bird and Color Preferences' declared frogmouths the be most 'instagrammable' bird species.

The surprising winner in this ranking is the frogmouth which seems to be a matter of poetic justice, as this nocturnal bird with very distinct facial features was once designated “the world’s most unfortunate-looking bird”

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8073730/

[–] You@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, that poor baby! At least this one has a happy end and serves as a reminder to regularly check what we dumb humans can cause out of ignorance.

[–] You@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hens and roosters don't fly

That isn't completely true. The wild ancestors of our chickens needed flight as part of their survival strategy.

The different breeds of chicken that still exist today have varying degrees of ability. In general they aren't good or persistent fliers. Of course humans are at fault. They kept and bred chicken for meat and egg production. That's why chicken mostly kept or developed even bigger muscles but their wingspan didn't keep up with their body weight. Smaller breeds with regular feathers can fly a short distance and reach a height of about 9 to 10 meters. That's why my grandfather regularly clipped the wings of his chickens and still had a high fence surrounding the area he kept them in. The chickens were still able to fly up into the small bushes and trees.

[–] You@feddit.org 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Looks like he experienced a real Oh-Shit!-Moment.

Ok, I'll see myself out...

[–] You@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just found out that my app offers a restore function. The comments are back.

view more: next ›