Forbo

Problem is, there's an entire generation of users that have gotten super used to "discard changes" as a means of signalling "on second thought, don't do anything".

The comment that kicked this whole thread off said she was his puppet. Seems like you're the one that jumped to "consensual and willing Russian asset".

You recognize that the electoral system is fucked enough that it doesn't matter if it's Greens, Libertarians, Communists, they all are relegated to the role of spoiler candidate purely from a game theory perspective? If she actually wanted to enact change her entire campaign would be focused down ballot where it's viable to get some ground, rather than taking on the role of the dog chasing the garbage truck that is the presidency. Whether she is knowingly helping Trump or Putin doesn't matter, the end result is still the same.

LET'S ALL LOVE LAIN

STCTD?

Please, for the love of all that is good, just give us a Linux client for Drive.

Scenario time: A loved one has recently passed away, and I want to find all the photos I have of them. I would love to be able to have a local AI perform facial recognition to help me find these photos. The classification and tagging info doesn't get fed into surveillance capitalist garbage, and I'm still able to benefit.

"What is this level of grand security..." Enumerated here: https://grapheneos.org/faq#future-devices

Once manufacturers can implement those things, then you will have an alternative to Google hardware for running Graphene. I'm not telling people to trust anything, don't put words in my mouth.

Who is PrivacyPhones and why should I believe they are in any way affiliated with Graphene?

GrapheneOS has defined a set of security standards for their operating system which have hardware requirements. These standards have been published and there have been efforts to engage with hardware manufacturers to adopt the required hardware. Blame the manufacturers for skimping on security, rather than Graphene being unwilling to compromising their values.

The security of your key is determined by the strength of your passphrase. Am I missing something?

Can we not with the "basement dweller" bullshit? Developers of free, open source software are volunteers putting forth a lot of time, energy, and effort only to get derided for it.

If I remember correctly F-Droid supports reproducible builds, but it's a matter of the app developer supporting them. So there is light at the end of the tunnel, we're just not there yet.