will uploading audio files become a thing? as a musician i need it
Announcements
Official announcements from the Lemmy project. Subscribe to this community or add it to your RSS reader in order to be notified about new releases and important updates.
You can also find major news on join-lemmy.org
Will an AMA comment sort type be added? Would be convenient to scroll by new replies from OP so we can easily keep up with AMAs
So, is the official term for AMAs on Lemmy "Ask Us Anything" (AUA)? Or shall we call it "Lemmy Ask U"?
Thoughts on a GPL4?
Many examples indicate an even stronger license is needed, I will list a few
-
The current RedHat debacle
-
MuseScore's closed source Musehub (after being acquired by Ultimatw Guitar)
-
Google commiting copyright infringement by combining free (as in freedom) software with code under Apache license for Android
We clearly need a stronger, more all encompassing license.
For me the whole point of fediverse is not depending on a single party for your socials/subs. But the current climate in each instance forces users to have accounts in multiple instances.
As a Lemmy user I believe account migration should be a default Lemmy feature which enables true federation for end users. Any plans for this feature in the near future?
Could you please create a middle ground between the nuclear option (banning sites) and the whack a mole option of banning users. It would be effective to be able to ban communities (at least temporarily) during bot spam attacks while you wait for admins to police up their site. Could there also be a way for admins to notify other admins that their site is spamming garbage so that admins know that their board is the cause of a problem and what that problem is?
Why is lemmy licensed under the AGPL3? What prompted you to take that decision?
Its a good hard copyleft license, and since its used in a network setting, the AGPLv3 over the GPLv3.
I have heard some respectable communities, namely r/AskHistorians, express hesitance at coming to Lemmy in part over fears of appearing biased due to the overt political stance of Lemmy's creators. In other words, it's hard to be a neutral body in affiliation with anything that has an overt political stance.
I wonder what the devs of Lemmy think of this hesitance. Is it unreasonable and itself biased? Or do you see any potential for finding a way to facilitate a platform that would allow for a more neutral space?
"Neutrality" as a concept doesn't exist. People who claim to be neutral are usually pro status quo, so they don't need to express any political views because things are going well for them so far with the current politics.
A few questions:
- Why did you name it Lemmy?
- What have some of the biggest challenges been in developing a Reddit-like community platform?
- What's a big feature you hope to implement someday?
- What are your dream features or rework you would ask a magic genie? I mean nice features that require a huge amount of work
- If you were to rewrite Lemmy from scratch, would you do everything the same way or would you rethink something?
Thanks for your amazing work, you guys are changing the world!
While I'm only a collaborator and not a maintainer, your second question is kind of reality already since there's a UI rewrite in a very early state to use leptos instead of infernojs.
Any regrets during your time working on Lemmy? Like implementing a feature and then later on thinking "Shit. This sucks, but I can't remove it now or it will fuck up everything later."
Why isn't there a feature to allow individuals to block whole instances?
Is there any coordination with The other fediverse projects (mainly mastodon) and mastodon client developpers to enhance the interoperability with each other.
for instance being able to flawlessly post to lemmy and get notified about replies to your mastodon instance in a more convenient and user friendly way. where mastodon and its clients recognizes that a reply is comming from a lemmy server and displays it in a threaded way.
- to stops showing every comment on posts made to community I follow as a separate post. it fills up the timeline. I know it's something to work on from the mastodon side. but maybe there are things lemmy can help improve.
With some other projects yes, but Mastodon not really. They often implement things in weird or nonstandard ways, and expect everyone else to deal with it. They even wrote an entire implementation for groups which is intentionally incompatible with Lemmy or other existing implementations. At least they had the good sense not to merge that.
Maybe I couldn't find it somewhere online, but is there a structured development roadmap for features you plan to implement? If not, what are the top priorities going forward? What are your long term goals with the project?
We don't have a written roadmap, but my current goals are:
- Performance improvements (DB, federation code)
- Creating a better onboarding site (joinlemmy)
- Stabilizing the API
- Becoming fully financially supported by donations, and hopefully growing our little dev co-op.
- Lots of code maintenance
- Notifications (Unified push)
- Better sorting to push content from smaller communities (a best sort)
- A better web UI written in rust (lemmy-ui-leptos)
What are the challenges posed by moderation (and admin in general) that you didn't think of when launching the first instance?
(and: How can things get improved, how can people help?)
Why are Lemmy devs so opposed to a Follow Thread feature? (The feature request is always immediately closed on github with the message: not planned)
Users being able to opt in to receive updates whenever a thread receives an edit to the post, a new comment, or a reply to a comment thread would be extremely useful.