this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
65 points (85.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
1028 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My 27 yr old sibling is a hard core follower of Joe Rogan 💩

What are some progressive channels/people/content that I could have my sibling start watching instead?

Preferably something that has a similar flavor - example: male host, muscular, easy to digest. I think that will make the transition easier.

My personal preferences are Seth Meyers and John Oliver, but Last Week Tonight (John Oliver) is even a heavy watch for me sometimes!

[No Andrew Hubbard. He’s another fake.]

Thank you!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] MxRemy@lemmy.one 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Seconding this rec, seems like a good fit

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

The Weeds and The Gray Area are also decedent topic driven interviews. Except generally with actual experts and well researched interviewers.

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

In the same CoolZone Media vein, Hood Politics might fit the bill as well.

[–] Octospider@lemmy.one 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If he's a "hard follower" of Joe Rogan than he likely won't be interested in other content. Rogan is a fool, but that's why people find him appealing. Content that is insightful and educational is the opposite of the junk food of Rogan.

Maybe instead, when Rogan says something like "Bro did you know like the pineal gland of the chimpanzee produces anti-covid hormones? This is just what I've heard. Look it up. By the way did you see the tree growing in my toilet?" You can help your sibling by teaching them ways to think, reason, and critically evaluate the BS that freely flows from the Roganverse.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Hey be careful when you are blatantly misquoting Joe Rogan to benefit your own exaggerations.

He clearly says that the pineal gland produces DMT. And you know how much Joe Rogan loves DMT.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bell@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Preferably something that has a similar flavor - example: male host, muscular, easy to digest. I think that will make the transition easier.

You don't think much of your sibling do you?

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago

I mean if they listen to Joe Rogan, they don't seem to think much of themselves either tbh. That counts as self-harm.

[–] toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Their sibling might be young. Young people are gullible idiots.

[–] HackyHorse3000@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Their sibling is 27 in this case, I think well past the age of "gullible young".

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You’ll find that folks can be gullible at any age. My step-kids, who live with their dad in Texas, are in their early 20s and get about 99% of their information from either YouTube or TikTok. For the youngest, church plays a big part. Generally speaking, they are good kids, but they are both gullible AF. I’m betting OP’s sibling has a similar diet of media consumption.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, the unbiased style of debate/news reporting is very dangerous.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Make him watch early Joe Rogan content. Back when he actually had an open mind and interesting guests.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 months ago

The Hasan Abi Broadcast

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

This comes off a little negative but totally get the desire to show a sibling something different,as someone who uses to listen to rogan regularly...

Find whatever guests he liked and nail down what it is he's actually interested in. For me it was history and comedy.

History of Rome with Mike Duncan then lead to youtubers like sandrhomanhistory and the operations room. If he's into more military and masculine show him forgotten weapons also on YouTube.

If you go as left mainstream as John Oliver it's gonna be an uphill battle. Even though I more than likely agree with what he would say have 0 desire to watch it.

Comedy wise the early cumtown episodes are goofy classics.

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 months ago

What I love about Mike Duncan is that you can hear him radicalizing in real time during the Revolutions podcast. By the time he reached the Haitian Revolution he’s done with everyone’s shit.

[–] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Before COVID Rogan's show was fantastic. As soon as the end of 2019 ramped up it was all down hill from there.

He went full Alex Jones.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Yeah it’s easy to hate Joe Rogan now but there’s a reason why he was the #1 most downloaded podcast for years. Huge range of guests and Joe’s, “Jack of all trades master of absolutely nothing besides MMA” knowledge base of questions got some good stories out of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarthYoshiBoy@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've never listened to Rogan*, but I think https://www.theskepticsguide.org/podcasts does an excellent job of talking about current news and science items in an easily digestible format that mostly avoids bullshit while probably filling the same gee-whiz niche that people expect from Rogan? It's a panel, so not a single muscular male host, but I think if your sibling is pursuing Rogan because they think it's helping expose them to new interesting ideas, SGU is a vastly superior route to that end.


*I actually think my only Rogan exposure has been the SGU talking about how he more or less just believes the last thing anyone told him, whatever that might be, which seems... less good?

[–] doofy77@aussie.zone 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Your preference is your preference, but SG1 and SGA are far better than SGU in my opinion.

[–] DarthYoshiBoy@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I assume this is a Stargate thing and that there aren't actually that many Skeptical Guide podcasts out there.

I haven't got any dog in the Stargate fight, I've seen the original movie (good) and watched the Richard Dean Anderson TV series (better than the movie) for a while before it just fell off my radar? I'll take your word for it that Stargate Universe is the lesser of the Stargate properties.

SGU in my comment obviously is referring to the Skeptics Guide to the Universe aka, the linked podcast.

[–] snack_pack_rodriguez@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

Beau of the fifth column on YouTube is just for this he tries to reach people at that level and doesn't talk down to them and is great on foreign policy concepts.

[–] gastationsushi@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

J Aubrey is a very entertaining long format YTer that explains many of the internet's worst villains. His take down of grifters don't target Joe himself, but help inoculate people from the "natural" hierarchies that dominate conservative thought.

https://m.youtube.com/@jaubrey/videos

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Good God, he has some of the most cringey clickbait thumbnails I've ever seen.

And just watching the first 5 minutes of the Steven Crowder episode, he's for sure not someone the Joe Rogan crowd would be interested in watching.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago

I read it here before but the best way is deconstructing a specific case of the person in question choosing. The problem is that replacing one influencer with another one won't change the understanding issue of misplaced trust in media/people.

I think that these things should be voluntary by the way. Both for success chances and pure respect for your sibling.

Ask him if they would be interested. Then make them choose an episode. Prepare yourself. Ask them to prepare a little document in which they express their understanding and lesson that they learned from the episode. Ask them if they are willing to investigate how true these things are. Look for evidence together or alone. When done, get together and talk about the truthfulness of the ideas.

Alternatively ask yourself if they have some kind of expertise in something and look if there is a Joe Rogan episode about and suggest them to watch it. The deconstruction would happen automatically. You can help by ask them questions about it. Having to vocalize criticism towards something is an amazing reflection exercise.

[–] NewWorldOverHere@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Edit: Going through all the suggestions now - thank you! I hadn’t heard of these before. I appreciate it!

[–] pb42184@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Modern Wisdom

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Would Lex Fridman fit the bill? He runs in the same circle as Joe Rogan with similar guests, but generally just let's his guests speak instead of actively pushing nonsense, and especially not with the degree of confidence that Rogan does while being wrong. It'll still require you to listen critically, but that might be easier if you don't have someone actively pushing you in one direction.

load more comments
view more: next ›