this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
197 points (98.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35548 readers
224 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Why even view pirated low-quality content, hidden behind a paywall? I mean, that's what too many newspapers and magazines offer. Unfortunately.

[–] CForsyth@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'll pop in to defend the Winnipeg Free Press as one of Canada's few independent papers. They still have their own journalists breaking stories.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Finally, some reading material devoid of Winnipeg!

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because I want to suffer, apparently. 😂

[–] Bluefruit@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you arent already, highly recommend ublock origin. Great broswer extension thats pretty much required to use the intermet nowadays if you dont want to pull your hair out.

Though some of theae websites still have popus like this built in unfortunately. But Ublock helps a lot.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I was already using ubo and Adguard, but these damn popups still came up. I'm going to tweak my filter list to see if I'm missing something.

If it's a site I visit frequently, I tend to manually block undesirable elements. But this was a one-off.

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fyi you don't need two adblockers on the same browser. They use the same lists anyways, you're using double the resources and improving load times for no real benefit

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I do agree.

However, I find that the element blocker in UBO is better than AdGuard, and it gives more control over blocking things like remote fonts. Since I run AdGuard system-wide, I just leave it on for the entire browser.

Adguard does create issues where certain sites simply will not work, so I have to disable Adguard, and I'll leave UBO on to block any ads or trackers that get through as a result.

It works for me. 😂👍

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Understood. It's fine to not follow the "best practices" if our use case requires otherwise. The important thing is to be aware of it!

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

It is a good reminder, though. I'm going to have to reevaluate some of my add-ons and settings. I prefer things to be minimalist, and perhaps I really am overlapping features unnecessarily.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If you are on Firefox, the ghostery addon is really nice as well. It blocks ads, trackers, and cookies, plus gives you information about what’s actually on the site (what the cookies are, how many it wants to shove on you and why, etc.)

It won’t block all the popups, but it does auto-decline some stuff, so you don’t get cookie notifications, for example.

Never-Consent Clicks you out of all consent dialogues in favor of never tracking. This unequaled feature adds convenience to each website visit and acts like your globally active privacy advocate towards content providers.

https://www.ghostery.com/ghostery-ad-blocker

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've used Ghostery before, for a while, actually! I love the extra details it provides.

Since I have a paid Adguard account, I use that system wide. UBO is left on because I like the element blocker it uses.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Give it a try again and see if it gets rid of that top popup. I never get notification requests like that.

The subscribe one will probably still be there though.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Give it a try again and see if it gets rid of that top popup. I never get notification requests like that.

Well, shit! I just installed it on a secondary, clean browser and did a before and after. What do you know? No popup when using Ghostery!

Now I have to figure out if it's a list that isn't enabled in the other blockers, or if they just suck. LOL

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think it’s just the way the extension works. Not really a list, but the extension is designed to click the decline link on anything that would lead to setting tracking cookies, like those notification requests.

Either way, I’m glad it worked!

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

An interesting thing to note is that I'm also seeing that my browser is asking whether to allow notifications from the site or not, rather than the site asking directly.

I'll have to do more testing. Ideally, I'd like to only use Adguard, since that's what I use across multiple devices. I'm sure I can find the filter list/settings that produce the same result as Ghostery... hopefully. LOL

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure you can disable that in the browser itself though.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, it can be disabled, but what I'm saying is that with my previous addon setup, the browser message didn't even show up - only the website gave this popup about receiving notifications. In hindsight, it seems like broken browser behaviour, and it's working as it should now.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 13 points 9 months ago

From the Thumbnail it looked like a Adobe Photoshop Error Message.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 months ago

Oh, this causes my control+w reflex.

[–] snownyte@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

I'll just assume the article had nothing worthwhile to read. Thanks for sparing my time!

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

I had it running. I also had Adguard (system wide) enabled. I need to tweak my filters 😂

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Using it on FF.

[–] JTheFox@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

If you haven’t already, would highly recommend looking into Unpaywall! Really helpful when it comes to viewing articles that require you to pay a subscription or sign up before viewing. Doesn’t always work but it gets a good amount! Plus it’s open source which is always a added bonus