this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
125 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

2710 readers
57 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It's quite astonishing that FIDE managed to be not only transphobic but also sexist and idiotic at the same time.

Almost deserves a medal

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing about stupidity, it has a lot of comorbidities.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Let’s not discount how many smart/educated bigots there are. Many members of the GOP in the US went to an Ivy League school and are smart in their own right. They aren’t all ignorant, many are just bad people.

[–] MeowyNinhaj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I agree but also school doesnt exactly indicate smartness.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Never said that lol I met plenty of dumbasses in undergrad

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

Transphobia is sexism.

And sexism is idiotic.

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 11 months ago

Chess and sexism go hand in hand like Bobby Fischer and antisemitism.

[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Does anyone know the bs reasons they gave to ban trans women? I don't understand how one of the least by gender divisible games pulled that off.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 43 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

I suspect that even they know that this is their own projected insecurities and that they don’t have any real justification. Better question: why do we separate players by sex in chess? Why does that matter? Just make one group and call it done.

[–] MagosInformaticus@sopuli.xyz 41 points 11 months ago

FIDE has two competitive circuits - the open circuit where men and women (cis or trans) can compete, and the women's circuit. Players can (and commonly do) compete in both circuits. Ultimately the goal of the women's circuit is to boost recruitment of female players and make competitive chess less of a boys' club. Opinions are divided on whether it's the most effective method.
The recent decision affects AMAB people who want to play in the women's circuit, but does not bar them from the open circuit.

It's a pretty shit decision as far as I can see, but it's good to make judgments on the facts.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

why do we separate players by sex in chess? Why does that matter?

It mostly boils down to male fragility
https://theconversation.com/whats-behind-the-gender-imbalance-in-top-level-chess-150637

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Out of curiosity, how did you get male fragility from that?

Reading through it there were several effects mentioned.

  • Testosterone makes men more likely to push to the highest level.

  • Women are discouraged from playing chess, and so less are set on a course to be amongst the best.

  • Women perform worse when they know they are competing against a man (thought to be a self fulfilling prophecy from stereotypes). Men don't seem affected by this.

None of those seem to be male fragility.

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

One reason I’ve heard that sports divide into groups by gender is that men are afraid they’ll get beaten by women. It happened in early baseball IIRC. (source: hazy memory. Disclaimer: I am male)

[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

FIDE probably thinks women are dumber than men. I don't see any other reason

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's basically what they said. They also claimed that women have less stamina than men, so aren't up to the long games of chess that men play.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Maybe they fear trans women's ability to cheat using vibrating anal beads?

[–] FirstMajesticComet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Bingo, people are going to make some argument about how it's because they do it to offer women fair opportunities but the real answer is that they think women are stupid or at the very least that men are smarter, realistically they think both.

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

You’re probably right.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

One too many.

[–] DavLemmyHav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago

This is so sexist. Sexism is wrong, ~~and being wrong is for women~~