this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45724 readers
133 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Check out my new community: !tech_memes@lemmy.world

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ngn@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

plus all the spying and the "telemetry" bs

[–] vane@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Armatures, I only write software using my hammer by punching holes in steel plates.

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

No Phyton, Jiverscrap is best.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago
[–] pewpew@feddit.it 0 points 4 days ago

"Python is bloat" wait until you look at NodeJS "node_modules" folder

[–] superkret@feddit.org 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"bloat" is just short for "your computer sucks".
Dump your peasant tier shit and go fill up that 42U rack.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Tbh this all seems to be related to following principles like Solid or following software design patterns. There's a few articles about CUPID, SOLID performance hits, etc

  • it all suggests that following software design patterns cost about a decade of hardware progress.
[–] _pi@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Absolutely not lol.

If SOLID is causing you performance problems, it's likely completely solvable.

Most companies throwing out shitty software have engineers who couldn't tell you what SOLID is without looking it up.

Most people who use this line of reasoning don't have an actual understanding of how often patterns are applied or misapplied in the industry and why.

SOLID might be a bottle neck for software that needs to be real-time compliant with stable jitter and ultra-low latency, the vast majority of apps are just spaghetti code.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I know it makes me sound like an of man shouting at clouds but the other day I installed Morrowind and was genuinely blown away by how smooth and reliable it ran and all the content in the game fitting in 2gb of space. Skyrim requires I delete my other games to make room and still requires a whole second game worth of mods to match the stability and quantity of morrowind.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but also community rewrite of the Morrowind engine, to make it even more better: https://openmw.org/

Admittedly, some changes might make it use more resources, for example it's got basically no loading screens, because nearby cells get loaded before you enter them...

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

I'm actually giving that a try now because it comes packaged with bazzite! I just wish I could figure out modding lol

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

That's fair, though honestly the only issue I ever had on the Xbox was having a loading screen every 5 minutes.

[–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

High res textures (especially normal maps) and higher quality/coverage audio really made game sizes take off. Unreal's new "Nanite" tech, where models can have literally billions of polygons, actually reduces game size because no normal maps.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Ah yes, those precious precious CPU cycles. Why spend one hour writing a python program that runs for five minutes, if you could spend three days writing it in C++ but it would finish in five seconds. Way more efficient!

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

So, I've noticed this tendency for Python devs to compare against C/C++. I'm still trying to figure out why they have this tendency, but yeah, other/better languages are available. 🙃

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Welp, microcontrollers say hi

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Welp, I'm not saying you should use Python for everything. But for a lot of applications, developer time is the bottleneck, not computing resources.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Because when it is to actually get paid work done, all the bloat adds up and that 3 days upfront could shave weeks/months of your yearly tasks. XKCD has a topic abut how much time you can spend on a problem before effort outweighs productivity gains. If the tasks are daily or hourly you can actually spend a lot of time automating for payback

And note this is one instance of task, imagine a team of people all using your code to do the task, and you get a quicker ROI or you can multiply dev time by people

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

You can write perfectly well structured and maintainable code in Python and still be more productive than in other languages.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 0 points 4 days ago

That also goes to show why to not waste 3 days to shave 2 seconds off a program that gets run once a week.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

exactly! i prefer python or ruby or even java MUCH more than assembly and maybe C

[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, I'd say it depends on what you do. When I see grad students writing numeric simulations in python I do think that it would be more efficient to learn a language that is better suited for that. And I know I'll be triggering many people now, but there is a reason why C and Fortran are still here.

But if it is for something small, yeah of course, use whatever you like. I do most of my stuff in R and R is a lot of things, but not fast.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago

But if it is for something small, yeah of course, use whatever you like.

or if you have a deadline and using something else would make you miss that deadline.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

It used to be pretty terrible, but the frameworks are getting there, starting with the languages they are based on.

Believe it or not, Java has been optimized a ton and can be written to be very efficient these days. Another great example of a high-level, high-efficiency language is Julia. And then there is Rust of course, which basically only sacrifices memory-efficiency for C-speeds with Python-esque comfort. It's getting better.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Love you homie 💋 walks away

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm happy if it's actually running in python and not a javascript app with electron.

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Idk, it's rare for an electron app to literally not even run. Meanwhile I'm yet to encounter a python app that doesn't require me to Google what specific environment the developer had and recreate it.

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

With a properly packaged python app, you shouldn't even notice you're running a python app. But yeah, for some reason there's a lot of them that ... aren't.

[–] gitamar@feddit.org 0 points 4 days ago

I think with pyenv and pipenv/UV you can create pretty reliable packaging. But it's not as common as electron, so it's a pain.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 days ago

That's fair.

load more comments
view more: next ›