this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
120 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39096 readers
3933 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A National Geographic expedition near the Solomon Islands discovered the world’s largest coral, visible from space and estimated to be 300 years old.

The massive coral, the size of a blue whale, stores centuries of oceanic history and far surpasses the previous record-holder, “Big Momma,” in size.

Located in the Coral Sea, the Solomon Islands host remarkable coral diversity but face threats from climate change, including coral bleaching.

Scientists called the discovery a “beacon of hope,” showcasing the resilience of deeper-water corals despite global warming impacts.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 53 points 6 days ago
[–] Skua@kbin.earth 16 points 6 days ago

This is ABC's fault rather than OPs, because the post title is the same as the article's, but it's not the largest coral reef. It's the largest individual coral.

[–] Origen@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Humanity: "Quick let's find some way to destroy it!"

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 15 points 6 days ago

"I'll bet there's oil under it"

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 13 points 6 days ago

Why does the headline say "coral reef" and the text say "coral"?

Does ABC really not understand the difference?

[–] Mannimarco@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

How is this a beacon of hope exactly?, this changes nothing, the threat is still there and will kill this reef sooner or later

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

How tf do you “discover” the largest coral reef on earth when it was literally visible from space.

Edit:

ABC is dumb and its a coral

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The correct romanization is "Omae wa mo shinderu."

「お前はも死んでる。」(not sure if it's でる or でいる actually, just learning the language.)

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

Yeah I haven't seen FotNS it like 20 years my bad. Had to search it with my single point American brain.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago