this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
128 points (95.1% liked)

Linux

48315 readers
1174 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
128
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Mwa@thelemmy.club to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

yes i did a os one but i am wondering what distros do you guys use and why,for me cachyos its fast,flexible,has aur(I loved how easy installing apps was) without tinkering.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Tuxedo OS. Same idea as smth like mint or PopOs but (imo) done much better. It also has rolling release for some stuff (like the DE) and non-rolling for other stuff (not even sure what bc I don't really look in detail). It also uses KDE plasma my favorite (and imo the best) DE. It's got pretty good app availability in terms of official packages because it is based on Ubuntu LTS (now 24.04). There are a couple things that are vestigial on most computers bc it was made for tuxedo computers but these have no negative effect on other devices in my experience.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 1 points 3 days ago

NixOS because all the other ones differ about as much as Windows 10 from Windows 11. Guix doesn't count.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago

Different distros for different uses:

  • Debian with KDE for my casual servers and Docker boxes.
  • Nobara for my main gaming PC.
  • Linux Mint with Cinnamon for my general purpose PCs and my #JustWorks uses.
  • Arch for my pimp mobile test machines.
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I use Ubuntu because it's the most popular and well-supported.

I'm going to be switching to Mint at some point because it's basically a community-run fork of Ubuntu and I don't trust Canonical anymore, but it's hard to justify installing my OS from scratch considering I've been using Ubuntu since 2017.

I recently ordered a Thinkpad T14 Gen1 with an R7 4750U, 16GB of RAM, and a 512GB SSD and you better believe I'm going to be putting Mint on that as soon as I get it.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Alpine:

  • Rolling release (Alpine Edge) yet stable
  • Extremely lightweight
  • Very customizable
  • After setting it up I find that it works very well
  • Decently sized repo
  • OpenRC rather then SystemD (I prefer the way it handles services)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I wonder how hard is it to download apps on Glibc-free systems, On Systemd-free systems ik there is Flatpack and stuff , asking this bcs many apps on Linux only work on Glibc.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hollerpixie@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Mint. I used to distro hop so much and just got tired of having to reload everything. That was the last one I had done prior to having no more time to switch. 😅 Plus, it just works and it's easy.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 11 points 6 days ago

Fedora.

I've tried them all but found it's the most reliable. It's upgrades are even more reliable than Macos and Windows.

Packages are very up to date but also well tested. Sometimes even newer than Arch for short periods.

The community is awesome.

I love Gnome, I've found it's more consistent than even MacOs in its design. And it has perfect keyboard shortcuts.

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago

Debian. Because it's the best about "Just Works" (yes, even moreso than Ubuntu, which I tried). It has broken once on me, and that was fixed by rolling back the kernel, then patched within the week.

BUT I'm also not a "numbers go up" geek. I don't give a shit about maxing out the benchmarks, and eking every last drop of performance out of the hardware; to me, that's just a marketing gimmick so people associate dopamine with marginally improved spec numbers (that say nothing about longevity nor reliability).

If you wanna waste something watching numbers go up, waste time playing cookie clicker, not money creating more e-waste so your Nvidia 4090 can burn through half a kilowatt of power to watch youtube in 8k.

(/soapbox)

My gpu is an nvidia 970 and my cpu is a 4th or 5th generation core i7. I just don't play the latest games anyway, I'm a PatientGamer, and I don't do multimedia stuff beyond simple meme edits in GIMP.

It has plenty of power to run VMs, which I do use for my job and hobby, and I do coding as another hobby in NVIM (so I don't have to deal with the performance penalty of MS Code or other big GUI IDEs).

It all works fine, but one day I'll upgrade (still a generation or two behind to get the best deals on used parts) and still not waste a ton of money on AAA games nor bleeding-edge DAWs

[–] woodgen@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Arch.

Because of pacman. Building and writing packages is simple and dependencies are slim. Also packages are recent. And most likely "there is an AUR package for that". Also stack transitions arrive early, like pipewire.

Also let's not forget Arch Wiki, i bet you have read it as a non Arch user.

I administer Arch on 8 machines including gaming rigs, home server, web server, kids laptop, wifes gaming desktop, audio workstation and machine learning rig and a bunch of dev laptops. I also use ArchARM on RPi for some home automation.

Never considered switching since I switched from Ubuntu over 15 years ago.

I do have experience with several other rpm and apt based distros.

[–] Penguincoder@beehaw.org 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fedora because it's stable and effective.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm currently using bazzite due to its really solid out of the box support for gaming hardware and peripherals.

I'm really surprised everyone uses arch. I have three theories as to why:

  1. There actually aren't that many arch uses but when arch users have the opportunity they won't hesitate to say "BTW I use arch" were as others don't really bother.
  2. There are lots of arch users and everyone uses it because they want to be able to say "BTW I use arch"
  3. (Very unlikly) There are lots of arch users and it's because it's actually a good distro that people like.

(This is mostly a joke jsyk I'm sure arch is a great distro)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] voracread@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

PCLinuxOS.

Stable and rolling for regular people OS.

[–] osugi_sakae@midwest.social 3 points 5 days ago

Haven't used it in a few years, but if it is still like it was, I highly recommend it for regular users. Solid, good choice of packages (for regular people). Don't remember ever having any problems with PCLinuxOS.

(I switched away only because I'm not a "regular" user.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Epicurus0319@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ubuntu, because I'm fine with something that "just works"

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How did you deal with snaps?

[–] Saithe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Fedora. I like the rolling release but with large updates separated into point releases, as well as the ability to perform offline updates. I also like the preinstalled security stuff

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 5 points 6 days ago

Mint on my ancient MacBook because I didn’t really know any better and it’s working just nice for me, and Asahi/Fedora on my M1 mini, because it’s the only option.

[–] hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago

Bazzite for personal stuff because it looked neat and just worked after installation with a small learning curve. Due to interia I went with bluefin on the work computer for the same reasons

[–] fatur0000new@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago

I use LMDE. I use it because Mint has proved that it is worth using (for example: it provide easy way to install multimedia codec by only click "Install Multimedia Codec" in applications menu) and I want it to success.

Sorry if my english is bad

[–] countrypunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

LMDE. It really does just work.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How does it fare compared with the standard Mint?

I've been considering try it but because of the focus on Cinamon I keep delaying it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I've been using Bazzite for a few months now (switched from EndeavourOS, which was great) and it's been amazing. I'm sold on atomic/immutable. I have never had a PC this stable, including every Windows PC I've had.

And it's perfect for gaming. There are weird little tweaks and settings that I had to do on EOS to get my GPU working correctly, etc., and they all just work out of the box in Bazzite (I did get the iso image made specifically for my laptop, which definitely helps). It's super impressive actually.

And distrobox (BoxBuddy comes installed) can be used to access the AUR or whatever if I feel the need to. Just fire up an Arch box, and have at it.

[–] ccoonH@mander.xyz 4 points 6 days ago

I used to use Arch btw.

Now I am on Nix, I just love shell.nix files. I haven't spent much time on my configs yet, but once I finish them, they'll be super easy to set up again, thats cool.

[–] AAA@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago

Fedora KDE.

I was happily using Windows 10 until a few months ago, but needed to build a new PC. I got a glimpse of Windows 11 on a friend's laptop and didn't like it. So I asked my Linux-friend which distribution he would recommend to someone who wants to try Linux, but doesn't want to stray too far away from the windows look and feel.

[–] Metju@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

2 flavors of Fedora with KDE on it:

  1. Aurora-DX for some dev work on the side. Once you get used to distroboxing / devcontainers, it's rock-solid and mean dev environment (saw some minor issues with how certain GUI apps were scaled, but that's about it).
  2. Nobara for gaming (tried Bazzite and it'd prolly work for that purpose as well).

Unfortunately, had to keep Windows on one other machine (fuck you KORG for not providing anything working on Linux), but that's limited to being a glorified music player now 😄

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TrivialBetaState@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago

MX Linux. It is Debian with setup and tools I really want but would be too lazy to prepare in one go. Love it as much as I love Debian.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

Bazzite for my gaming pc, steam deck, and family members. It just works and they cant fuck it up. Even brother laser printers official drivers installed for my mom's comp. Gotta check the details of that cups exploit though. My gamig pc is also the fallback pc I expect to always have working and for servicing any others if problems come up.

Arch or arch based, except manjaro which has screwed me over too many times, for having easy access to pretty much any software that can run on linux, or just stuff that requires too many hoops to jump through to get working on atomic distros like bazzite.

Dietpi on my SBCs like the ones running klipper for my 3d printers

Debian for my servers, homeassistant etc, but I'm planning on checking out coreos.

Also alpine just because.

[–] MXX53@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

Fedora 41 KDE at home on my daily driver laptop and desktop.

Antix on my dell mini netbook.

Multi machine VMs I manage at work run on red hat enterprise with no DE or WM.

My web app servers at work run Ubuntu server 24 LTS with no DE or WM.

My home lab runs on fedora 41 server, no DE or WM.

[–] maliciousonion@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Because the logo is cool :)

[–] callyral@pawb.social 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I use NixOS for my desktop because ~~I hate myself~~ you can configure everything without needing to edit a bunch of different config files that use different configuration languages.

I use Arch btw for my Minecraft server because I am crazy.

[–] Ovata@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Been using Mint with the Cinnamon desktop environment for a few years now. Does everything I need it to.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

A few for different use cases. NixOS on my wife's 14 year old laptop because it proved to handle the hardware the best, and she struggles with change so if that system dies the NixOS configuration can be redeployed identical to how she had it with no additional effort.

Debian on my old IOmega NAS.

OpenSUSE on my personal PC and Work computer, since it supports my proprietary CAD software, and nVidia releases a driver specifically for SUSE/OpenSUSE use.

[–] ProtonBadger@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

I started with Slackware in the late nineties. Have been through Redhat, Suse, Ubuntu, Arch, Tumbleweed. These days I just can't be bothered, I just want to game and code and I prefer an out of the box well configured Ubuntu derivative, they also upgrade easily and have lots of application compatibility - mostly everyone provides .deb packages. I could also choose Fedora for these reasons.

So now on Pop!_OS 24.04. Pop is has a stable/lts base but still gets Mesa/Nvidia/Kernel updates on a regular basis. I use it mainly for gaming and Rust dev, writing some COSMIC applets as well.

COSMIC Alpha does still have problems with some games but not the games I play.

load more comments
view more: next ›