this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
35 points (87.2% liked)

Privacy

32103 readers
668 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is a detail that makes it possible: the absurd over sharing everywhere. If only everyone did not think to plaster everywhere their face with their selfies and decide to share everything everywhere, then maybe something like this would be a lot harder to implement (if possible on certain cases)

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, everyone had their photos taken for their IDs, and these photos might've easily been stolen or leaked... Wonder if this would be enough for such a system.

Not really. The more pictures that are available for a person, the fewer false positives there are, if you only have one face on photo that can be confidently linked to you, you would only ever be identified by that exact angle and feature set. It would be useless outside of applications that specifically request that (and even then it's really buggy, any Uber driver can attest to how shit facial recognition can be with limited info).

[–] ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That is for sure a good question, although I would say it would present limitations.

Let's put it this way: Id photos are very standard. Front facing, until the neck, white lights, white background. Now lets say everyone's photo got leaked (or used) and the only source of photos for a certain photo is the Id one only. I didn't study the matching algorithms, but I will say that variation for a certain subject under different circumstances increase the matching possibilities. If by any chance you try to match someone live and the only source would be id photos, my guess is it would present a big error rate. Possibility could be fine tuned, not sure up to how much.

Now lets consider what we have today. For a single person, I will bet there are on average more than 15 photos of themselves somewhere available (for those chronically attached to stuff such as IG of fb) and a lot of the times tagged as well (and manually as well, there was a time on fb this was a big thing). With this amount of comparison points, I would say the matching for sure works a lot better

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, then I can sleep calmly I guess. There are some group pictures with me, but none have me tagged specifically so I guess that's not as bad.

[–] Cuttlersan@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that’s terrifying 0.0 add something like that to that flamethrower drone dog out of Ohio and we’re looking at a real nightmare.

[–] dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

this is like month+ old info, at least mention that when posting. otherwise people assume it's an update.

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Here is the original source if you are interested.