The continuing American embargo on Cuba after the Cold War has always been toddler tantrum level of pettiness.
I thought Obama had finally closed that chapter, but I was wrong.
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
492 points (97.7% liked)
World News
32349 readers
869 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Obama had started. But Trump reversed.
This was so fucked up. I know presidents shouldn't be able to set things in stone, but it shouldn't be so easy for a petty president to just undo the all last ones things just cause they're a thin skinned bitch
Well, the world certainly understands that the US holds a grudge. But Castro is dead. Feels a bit silly at this point
From everything I've read over time - it's not even the US that holds a grudge, it's been popular on both sides of politics to end the embargo.
But neither will since it means losing the massive voting bloc of Cuban-Americans in Florida, Florida itself often being a decider of US elections. They don't want the embargo to end and anyone who supports ending it losses their vote.
Their reasons seem to vary, from the worst being wealthy land owners who had their lands taken by Castro only wanting relations normalised if they get their land back to the more common escapees who don't want to normalise relations with the 'Castro government' ever, that Cuba needs to ditch the regime first.
Florida hasn't been a swing state in years, and it's not like Cuban Americans are ever going to vote Democrat regardless.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Why don’t they want it to end?
Silly and grudge are very interesting terms to describe an illegal embargo that brings millions in the brink of starvation and poverty.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Always the same map
looks like impunity
I used to believe that the Cuba embargo is due to Cuban refugee vote in Florida.
But that doesn't make sense anymore given that Florida is no longer a swing state. In fact it never really made sense since the demo that is very pro-embargo has always been solidly Republican and therefore unwinnable.
So what really explains the embargo? Quite frankly I think it's banana republic foreign policy and wealthy people in the US not wanting there to be a successful socialist state. For instance, the recent energy crisis in Cuba is driven by the Biden administration sanctioning oil tankers who visit the island. Why on earth would the supposedly pro-Cuba democrats do that? Who asked them to do that? Who had the clout to make them do that? Some losers in Florida who were going to vote for Trump in a red state anyway?
What a stupid policy.
Axis of evil.
Embarrassing country to live within, but Hitler talk and our genocidal crusaders state make us the evil of greater proportions now.
Just imagine if the UN had teeth for enforcement, at least for overwhelming votes like this. I feel like its one of the biggest oversights of the post WWII order they tried to make.
Big countries, of course, would never allow that, but still.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's also a shame that Argentina, while it voted in favor, actually wanted to vote against.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgl4y6w2r33o
Not surprising because:
blockade /blŏ-kād′/ noun
The isolation of a nation, area, city, or harbor by hostile ships or forces in order to prevent the entrance and exit of traffic and commerce.
The forces used to effect this isolation.
The shutting up of a place by troops or ships, with the purpose of preventing ingress or egress, or the reception of supplies.
"the blockade of the ports of an enemy"
welcome to the rules based world order that yankeestan is peddling
The author needs to learn the difference between a blockade and an embargo. Cuba hasn't been under blockade since the end of the missile crisis.
It's very much a blockade in practice since it prevents the vast majority of companies of any country from trading with Cuba.
There are very few companies that would survive competition by sacrificing trade with the nearby US to trade with Cuba instead the way the "embargo" forces them to.
load more comments
(1 replies)
An embargo would imply its just America that can't trade with Cuba. In reality, almost nobody can trade with Cuba, because any ship that does cannot enter American ports to trade with America.
It may not be a blockade by the dictionary definition, but it's certainly not just an embargo.
view more: next ›