this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
-3 points (41.2% liked)

Fediverse

17770 readers
2 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
-3
Minetest-Luanti rejected suggestion (github.com)
submitted 4 weeks ago by hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

They don't want to get the "First Game of the Fediverse" title

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Trent@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Or maybe they just think it's a bad idea? Personally, I do too.

[–] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org -3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually not, it allows you to interact from different servers from a single account in one instance

[–] Trent@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 weeks ago

Actually not what? And yes, I know. Apparently they think that's a bad fit for the thing they're doing. If you disagree, it's open source, fork it and implement it.

[–] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Another potential technology they could use would be Matrix, so that servers can send commands to each other in real time. It's better suited for this kind of interactive services than ActivityPub is. Or you could also try XMPP with extensions.

[–] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org 2 points 4 weeks ago

ActivityPub does support extensions (looking at you, ForgeFed, as an example), but you can be right depending on which protocol they could choose

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

think again

what why?

[–] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org 2 points 4 weeks ago

Didn't inted to say that anyway but my changes to thread body couldn't be send to this community's instance

I edited that out

Edit: I was typing that out because someone thought they would develop their games there