this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
315 points (99.1% liked)

News

23367 readers
4864 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On Tuesday, Louisiana will become the first state in the U.S. to categorize two widely used abortion pills as “controlled dangerous substances.”

Opponents argue the classification could have catastrophic impacts in a state that already has a near-total abortion ban and one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the nation. Doctors fear the reclassification will cause delays in accessing the drugs — mifepristone and misoprostol — which together can be used to manage miscarriages, while misoprostol induces labor and treats severe bleeding after delivery. They also worry the practice of reclassifying the drugs might spread beyond Louisiana.

Proponents say the new law should help prevent coerced abortion, pointing to a Texas case in which a pregnant woman was given seven misoprostol pills by her husband without her knowledge; the baby survived. Over the past 15 years, news outlets have reported on similar cases — none in Louisiana — but the issue does not appear widespread.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] graycube@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

This only impacts poor people because the more affluent simply leave the state to get care.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So states can make up their own drug classifications as long as it's for the worse? Why isn't marijuanna recognized for it's lower classification for states vs federally.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

States legalizing it are doing so because the federal government is basically turning a blind eye to the supremacy clause on that topic (for the most part). States always have the right to be more restrictive than the federal government, but when they try to make laws less restrictive, it's technically not on solid legal ground. That said, laws only matter when they are either enforced, or blindly followed.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

this is what happens when fifty of the United States are allowed to have state laws override federal laws

this will only get resolved when the individual states are made to follow one set of federal laws for everybody no matter which state they happen to be in

[–] HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

so states with cannabis dispensaries don't count? or the states allowing abortion?

state laws do supersede federal all the time unless the state likes the federal version better

[–] HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

those states are violating the law and betting the Fed Govt won't intervene.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

so states with cannabis dispensaries don't count? or the states allowing abortion?

By law? Yes, they do. It just isn't being enforced.

It still causes financial issues though. Banks won't touch them, for instance.

[–] hahattpro@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

As a foreigner, i have hard time to understand why US go so hard on abortion pill.

Is it religions or something ban it ?

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is power, under the guise of religion.

Nothing satisfies fake Christians more than having power over everyone except themselves.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Those failed states in the south are basically undeveloped countries, and religion is the only way their leaders can claim to be actually be superior to other states, so they can't read or write or get decent jobs, but praise the lord they're better 'christians'.

They used to have racism to let them know they were at least superior to black people, but we slowly took that away from them and they will never, ever forgive us.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

no but the guise of religion may be there

this is just like cannabis and immigrants and now women are on the list

the more we criminalize the more citizens get put on the list such as probation

criminals have to be papered and tracked and they have less rights makes them easier to handled and they already have a task force just for that called police that help keep us all in our proper places

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only feasible restriction should be to just keep them behind the pharmacy counter. Only to allow the pharmacist to advise on the best most effective and safest use.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But what about when you run into pharmacist nutters who refuse to advise on or sell them because of their beliefs? It has happened before.

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In an imaginary sane and just world, they would have their pharmacists license taken away for that.