this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
3220 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I remember when I was growing up, tech industry has so many people that were admirable, and you wanted to aspire to be in life. Bill Gates, founders of Google Larry Page, Sergey brin, Steve Jobs (wasn't perfect but on a surface level, he was still at least a pretty decent guy), basically everyone involved in gaming from Xbox to PlayStation and so on, Tom from MySpace... So many admirable people who were actually really great....

Now, people are just trash. Look at Mark Zuckerberg who leads Facebook. Dude is a lizard man, anytime you think he has shown some character growth he does something truly horrible and illegal that he should be thrown in prison for. For example, he's been buying up properties in Hawaii and basically stealing them from the locals. He's basically committing human rights violations by violating the culture of Hawaiian natives and their land deeds that are passed down from generation to generation. He has been systematically stealing them and building a wall on Hawaii, basically a f*cking colonizer. That's what the guy is. I thought he was a good upstanding person until I learned all these things about him

Current CEO of Google is peak dirtbag. Dude has no interest in the company or it's success at all, his only concern is patting his pockets while he is there as CEO, and appeasing the shareholders. He has zero interest in helping or making anyone's life pleasant at the company. Truly a dirtbag in every way.

Current CEO of Home Depot, which I now consider a tech company because they have moved out of retail and into the online space and they are rapidly restructuring their entire business around online sales, that dude is a total piece of work conservative racist. I remember working for this company, This dude's entire focus is eliminating as many people as feasibly possible from working in the store, making their life living heck, does not see people as human beings at all. Just wants to eliminate anyone and everyone they possibly can, think they are a slave labor force

Elon musk, we all know about him, don't need to really say much. Every time you think he's doing something good for society, he proves you wrong And does the worst thing he can possibly do in that situation. It's like he's specifically trying to make the world the worst place possible everyday

Like, damn. What the heck happened to the world? You know? I thought the tech industry was supposed to be filled with these brilliant genius people who are really good for the world...

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 0 points 3 months ago

I'd blame capitalism. And corporations prefering short term growth and attracting investors. And the whole modern business model of exploiting users private data to sell advertisements. That's how the whole internet works these days and thak makes being evil baked into every successful company.

And btw: Zuck did one good thing. He personally gave us competetive AI models to tinker around with. If it weren't for people like him, we would have AI dominate us without the average person having access to more than the online services like ChatGPT. Yeah but that doesn't take away from the things you lined out.

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Their job is to maximize shareholder profit. That is their only and one true job as CEOs. If you want a CEO that is not evil, look for companies that are not public even though they could be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don't get to be a billionaire and a decent person. Choose 1.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Bill Gates was an evil piece of shit, that did many illegal things to secure Microsoft's software empire.

It was much easier to "hide" sit back then unless you were in the know in the industry.

That said I think because tech was such a young industry and innovating so quickly. Many geeks got a chance to run companies that took off. Nowadays it's Like every other industry with sociopaths in charge.

[–] wazoobonkerbrain@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bill Gates was an evil piece of shit, that did many illegal things to secure Microsoft’s software empire.

Yup. And his wife left him because of his association with Epstein.

Melinda Gates Says Bill Gates's Work with “Abhorrent” Jeffrey Epstein Led to Divorce

[–] endofline@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

Nah, she knew about his husband and Epstein ( and his at least strange occupation ) far lower than she's wiling to admit.

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago

It was much easier to “hide” sit back then unless you were in the know in the industry.

It wasn't hidden. Everybody knew back in the day what an evil piece of shit he was.

It has just been forgotten about and many current adults weren't old enough, or even around, in the heyday of his evil empire, so he has been able to whitewash his image. My 50 year old ass remembers though. Fuck Bill Gates.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Two big ones:

  1. Power corrupts

  2. The laws in America have been bent or repurposed specifically to serve the entity, not person, with more money over all else.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

sociopaths have a pretty big advantage in capitalist leadership positions over non-sociopaths. they are more likely to get there in the first place, and they will perform better.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

In all leadership positions, period. Capitalist or communist. Democratic or autocratic. Does not matter, those that are not held back by their morals have an advantage.

[–] Crow_Thief@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In communist societies, many people who rise to power are evil, because theyre seeking their own power primarily. In capitalism, anybody who is not actively evil enough gets thrown under the bus because theyre getting in the way of profits. Communism allows it, capitalism requires it.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It is the opposite. In capitalism, there is at least a chance a good person has some power because power is not only held by governments. There are multiple examples in the main post. Even better examples are European countries where the government and businesses hold each other in check instead of govt being bought off legally like in the US.

In communism, the way power is distributed ensures corrupt people raise to the top. See an amazing video "rule for rulers" by CGP gray for a simplified explanation how that corruption works and why a good person can't hold power.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

CGP Grey refers to dictatorships in that video, not communism exclusively. Marx predicted a revolution of labor that would get rid of scarcity which was never realized by the Soviet system. If you read a bit about it you'll see that the so-called marxists never reached communism, as they kept pumping resources into the government, police and bureaucracy.

Communism. A utopian society without classes, divisions of wealth, exploitation or suffering. Members would provide what they could and receive what they need. The instruments of state, like government bureaucracies, police and military, would become unnecessary and would “wither away”.

Rules for rulers is explicitly about human behavior in heirarchy, not specifically anti communist. He mentions fascist dictatorships and monarchial systems as well.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs

https://alphahistory.com/russianrevolution/marxism/

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

CGP gray very specifically refers to democracies as well and explains how things like farm subsidies are used to buy votes. Maybe re-watch the videos.

And yes, CGP gray also indirectly explains why Marxists kept pumping resources into the government, police and bureaucracy. It is inevitable in a system where you concentrate power in a limited group of people.

That is why distributing power between large number of independent capitalists and voters is the system that so far worked best, although still very far from perfect.

As long as humans behave like humans and are in charge, the utopian communism is as realistic as wizards in flying castles.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The book he references in that video does not make the capitalist argument you are making and by my interpretation neither does CGP. Capitalism is not inherently democratic as the market is unregulated by government. If you vote with your dollar, those with more money have more votes.

I've edited my previous comment with more context and sources.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry if it is unclear, I am saying CGB Gray explains how corruption happens in leadership structures and why it is so difficult to prevent.

The opinion that this is why capitalism can work better than communism is entirely my own logical conclusion. I am not trying to claim CGP Gray said so.

Again sorry for the confusion.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No worries! I'm just trying to clarify.

I also think you're referencing an older ideation of capitalism. I think what you're talking about is just commerce.

Check out that NPR article I posted earlier. People are changing the meaning of capitalism and it's helping them justify not taxing billionaires.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the terminology around this kinda sucks. I always have an issue with whether I should call it capitalism or not when I mean a heavily regulated version of it, including some social policies.

I just don't know a better word for it and it is difficult to concisely express what I mean without saying capitalism and hoping people figure out what I mean from context.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Please name which country in Europe has a government thats hasn't been bought and paid off.

Of course, no one can. Unfortunately, that's because capitalism is incompatible with actual democracy. Theres isn't a country in the world whos democratic process and systems of governance hasn't been utterly corrupted by capitalism and all that it brings with it.

If there's a top that someone could rise to, it isn't communism.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Netherlands? Switzerland? Norway?

Like sure, there always is some corruption but relatively insignificant amount.

Honestly, I can't think of an EU country that is anywhere near the US levels of "corrupted by capitalism".

If there's a top that someone could rise to, it isn't communism.

What? Top? What do you mean?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago

Because you can’t climb to the top of the pile without treading on people and crushing others.

[–] Tire@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

Normal well adjusted people get a few million dollars and call it a day. Only people with a mental problem get billions and keep trying to get more.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bill Gates, founders of Google Larry Page, Sergey brin, Steve Jobs (wasn’t perfect but on a surface level, he was still at least a pretty decent guy), basically everyone involved in gaming from Xbox to PlayStation and so on, Tom from MySpace… So many admirable people who were actually really great…

They weren't that good, just charming.

And, well, they also at least knew where their power came from. Maybe Jobs was not some genius inventor normies consider him to be (those who remember him), maybe Bill was born to a rich family, but they still knew deeply enough what they were doing and they really had visions of future (they wanted, of course, to get all the dough from those being reached, but that's a normal capitalist wish) towards which they were walking step by step for decades. They can be compared to WWI ace pilots in some sense (not about risking their lives).

Still they were doing things similar to what corps do now. Just a bit more subtly, because it required some subtlety back then.

Then their corporations overgrew them, and outlived some of them.

Elon musk, we all know about him, don’t need to really say much. Every time you think he’s doing something good for society, he proves you wrong And does the worst thing he can possibly do in that situation. It’s like he’s specifically trying to make the world the worst place possible everyday

I have a suspicion he just secretly wants to help those big corps suicide themselves to free space for something new and good.

Like, damn. What the heck happened to the world? You know? I thought the tech industry was supposed to be filled with these brilliant genius people who are really good for the world…

Everything ages and rots. The secret to still having the world nice and fresh and optimistic is waste disposal. And also removing weeds from your garden. Like those corps and politicians.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

Power corrupts.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

They were all evil shit back then... You were just innocent and information didn't travel as fast

Also, Jobs "pretty decent"? That asshole was Narciso reborn

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AWittyUsername@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Late stage capitalism. It's the same in every industry, it's just that it's more obvious in tech.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›