this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
5370 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Haven’t we always known this? It’s the same concept as a Stingray device, which is used to spy on people because their devices connect to it automatically, assuming it’s a normal cell tower. People don’t know what tower they’re connected to, so if you connect to a “fake” or exploited tower, you’ve basically handed over the keys. This is essentially the same thing, but on a 5g network, which is presumably made up of even more nodes/towers.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Stingrays generally use 2G, as the security on earlier standards was pretty lax/broken. I thought that tower spoofing wasn't possible on 4G/5G?

[–] bzarb8ni@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

4G had a lot of the same issues as 3G, but 5G was a complete redesign (including security). It was supposed to have been way harder to break than previous generations.

[–] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Always assume that even if not publicly available, some agency has knowledge of how to spy on you.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

what is the benefit to end user from 5G?

And all these features for the threat actors lol

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Higher peak data rate, lower latency, more network capacity are basically the main improvements for phone users. Partially because the whole radio protocol (among other things) was redesigned to reduce overhead and also because of the new mmWave bands which have enormous bandwidth.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can't tell the difference in everyday usage. Speeds are surely as fuck ain't any better.

[–] Zeoic@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Was a massive improvement here. Went from 50mbps down with a decently long delay when loading new pages to 800Mbps with basically instant page loading.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I never seen anything nearing 800mbps for cell phones outsid of corpo propaganda but maybe your area is not as congests as tests in major cities

[–] Zeoic@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I am not in the downtown core, but and pretty well right in the middle of a 1 million population city. I do believe the 5G tower is on the building right beside mine though, so I may just be lucky.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

“Flaw”. Sure. Okay.

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago

What, you mean like facebook and google?

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Hackers just released data on 3 billion people. Feels like there's no point.

[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 0 points 3 months ago

I’d like to dig up some technical information on this. It has a lot of claims of what hackers can do but how do they do it at a technical level? Is using VPN helpful? Stuff like that.

[–] 432@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Joke's on them. I still use a flip phone, lol.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

yawn. HTTPS solves this.

[–] polumrak@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Ive installed so much crap voluntarily, I don't think I have any private data left. Why would they even bother?