this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
5464 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

I'm actually upset you can't use Nest Audio speakers as audio out. Apple TV lets you do it with home pods, Google said they were working on it, guess they were too busy adding AI garbo to the new device.

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not surprised. Like chromecast audio, chromecast couldn't really serve an adequate amount of ads. Basically it's only value was it forced you to use stock youtube app to stream preventing any adblocking, but if you cast your screen, then it can't stop adblocks, so it makes sense to discontinue this product. There's some open source projects out there that might be worth looking into, NymphCast is one I saw, uses a rasberry pi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Antergo@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They actually have a great product, and they're canceling it? The new ones were kind of expensive already, but every app supported it and it was very nice

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maybe they’re coming out with something new and more expensive, or they’ve entered a licensing deal with another -cast-able company so they can charge you or get licensing fees without the manufacturing overhead.

Or maybe they’re just being Google and cancelling yet another thing that people like to use.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Its #1, its in the article. Has some forgettable name, haha

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

1 and a little of 2. New device and a new way to charge you.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They are, I saw an article for it the other day. Some compact set top box running Android TV that costs way more than any Chromecast ever did.

Casting is nice but I'm thinking now is a good time to consider switching to something like Apple TV if you need a dedicated streaming device since there's basically no price difference anymore.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

I've had good luck with Roku so far, I know they're questionable but short of building a system to handle casting/streaming for me they seem to be the best bet right now

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is why they have no great products, they kill all the ones that are

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

How can it be a great product if the screen doesn't have more ads than a '90s geocities page?

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It didn't have planned obsolescence in it. People bought the 3 devices they needed for their house, and have been coasting off them for a decade. Maybe with the occasional refresh for 4k or a worn out USB port or whatever.

Just corporate greed on display here. People stopped buying them because the product was simple and did what it was supposed to for a long time. Gotta enshitify it so we see those $$$ roll in again.

Edit - they also probably thought it would be a revenue stream for buying videos through Google or get their cut from some android app, but people instead watched their media from sources outside their pay umbrella

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Yeah I've had the same Chromecast since close to when they first came out. Haven't had any problems outside of apps not supporting it very well sometimes, which isnt really a problem with the device itself. Still works perfectly even with pretty constant use as I use it for having videos on while I fall asleep.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok. Can someone please update https://killedbygoogle.com/ with this and increase the counter with +1?

[–] hefty4871@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Won't Chromecast still exist as a service? Just because they aren't making the dongle doesn't mean all the Chromecast enabled devices are just going to stop working or even being made. Just about every display that's made has Chromecast built in now.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

as you were corrected elsewhere, no they don't.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago

The casting protocol? Yes. Those devices? No. They're moving to Android TV devices with different branding

[–] Crampon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Switched to apple TV already. Googles lame ad infused cheap plastic remote did the trick on me. They have to pay ME if they want a Youtube and Netflix ad laying on my table at home.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Don't turn your remote over or you'll have an Apple ad laying around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] exanime@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Add it to the pile of dead google projects

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago

Dead successful projects.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't know anything about newer Chromecast but I really love my older one. Its just a dumb stick with no apps built in that I can cast stuff from my phone to. The only recent annoying thing with it is that the YouTube app changed the behaviour when you're connected, so now instead of tapping on a video to bring up a menu asking whether to play it now or add it to the queue it now just defaults playing it now when you tap on it. Makes setting up a queue of videos really annoying now cause you have to tap on the three dots to add it to the queue now.

[–] lemerchand@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

Noticed this too and it's annoying as ferk. It's messed up many a queue between my wife and i

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is why I'd never invest in anything Google.

It's already rolling the dice to see if they enshitify things fast enough to ruin it for me, but now you know they will just kill whatever you have been using on a whim

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Isn't Chromecast built into most devices now? Why would someone need a dongle to do what the TV can do natively? Otherwise something like an Nvidia Shield is a better option anyway.

[–] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No? Some of the most popular TV brands like LG and Samsung don't. And if your TV doesn't have Android, buying a Chromecast is a super cheap way to get it.

I have an amazing 4k oled TV but it doesn't have android so I still had to buy a Chromecast for it because otherwise I had no way to watch TV.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anonymousllama@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I've never even seen this thing? All the Chromecast I've seen over the last 4-5 years have been in-built modules in Android TVs.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›