this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30564 readers
329 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The other thread about favorite mechanics is great, so let's also do the opposite: what are some of your most hated mechanics?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KickMeElmo@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Game timers. I want to screw around on my time. The more time-based a game becomes, the less I enjoy it.

[–] _ice_witch_@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Timers just really stress me out for some reason. Give me more time damn it.

[–] Anabriated@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I could never get into Animal Crossing for this very reason

[–] Synthclair@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yes! I remember that I could not really enjoy fallout 1 because of the 150 in-game days time limit to get the water chip...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drazzkal@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Daily quests or login rewards, things to force me to play the game, always stop playing

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People have said escort quests but I'm going to go more specific.

Escort quests WHERE THE NPC INEXPLICABLY HAS A DIFFERENT WALKING/RUNNING SPEED THAN THE PLAYER.....

[–] drmatus@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it was on one of the Half-Life 2 developer commentary where they mention that the made the NPC move faster than your walking speed, but slower than your running speed, so that you are able to catch up with them if you stay behind to look at something. If they move at your running speed, you are kinda forced to follow them all the time, and any obstacle will separate you more and more from the NPC that you are supposed to escort.

[–] AbelianGrape@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

But that feels terrible if you want to follow them without stopping (or in the case of obstacles, are able to).

Even Ocarina of Time, in 1998, got this right. The Dampe race, which isn't technically an escort, would feel weird if Dampe was too much faster or slower than you, because it would feel unfair. But not everyone moves as fast while playing - some people like rolling, which is a different speed from walking, etc. Also, he throws fireballs at you, and players who are less good at dodging them will end up being slower. So Dampe doesn't "follow you," (in fact, he spends most of the thing in front of you), but he has a rubber band effect. If you get too far behind, he slows down. If you get too far ahead, he speeds up. This does a good job of keeping him in view, which helps give the feeling that you're going at an intended pace, whatever reasonable pace you take. If you're too slow, you will fail, but... it pretty much requires standing still or getting hit by lots of fireballs.

In contrast, the Yunobo escort in BOTW feels terrible casually and even worse to speedrun. He's faster than you walk, but much, MUCH slower than you run. And if you get too far ahead of him? He stops.

[–] idiotexe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have yet to play a game where NPCs have the same speed as the player, have you? I get it on the game design level, since NPCs need to move at a speed that their animations look natural at but player characters need to move fast enough to not feel frustrating to the character.

[–] jws_shadotak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have yet to play a game where NPCs have the same speed as the player, have you?>

RDR2 did an excellent job with this by making it more of a pseudo cutscene. You can just hold a button and your character will match the target speed.>

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ycnz@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 year ago

The bit in the RPG when your character gets captured and you lose all your gear, and have to do the shitty stealth thing.

[–] setsneedtofeed@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've never been a fan of character weapon skill being tied to the bullet not hitting where the player is aiming in first person RPGs and immersive sims. Think something like Fallout 3, where a shot with a sniper rifle can be perfectly lined up, but the bullet might veer off randomly.

I do understand and appreciate character weapon skills being tied to certain weapons encrouages distinct playstyles, but there are many other ways to implement it that don't feel as arbitrary. Tying character skill to greater reticle sway, longer time to aim down sights, longer reload times, more likely to jam or jams taking longer to clear. It accomplishes the same goal of rewarding putting points into the skill and making players feel like they are progressing, but without creating the instant frustration of missing a clearly lined up shot.


On that note, actively degrading weapons are not something I think has ever been a good idea. It's neither fun, nor is the rate of degradation ever realistic. If the goal is to make player cautious, then limiting ammunition and the availability of good weapons is a much better idea. I have no problem with weapons in different conditions existing in a game, for example: Pristine rifle, good rifle, rusty rifle, etc. That's fine, but a good rifle should never degrade into a rusty rifle in the hands of the player.


Areas of open worlds dynamically level scaling to match players is another gripe I have. Once a player notices it, it takes away the feeling of progress from leveling up. In some cases, smarter players in games have found certain areas easier to beat with low level characters. It creates a bad kind of meta-game. I much prefer worlds where every area is built with a certain player level in mind. Honestly, overleveling in RPGs and going to wreck starting bandit camps is a joy that shouldn't be taken away.

[–] pumpkin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know it's a popular mechanic that lots of people love, but I really don't like games where you die a lot, or where death has significant impact. I generally play games to chill out and just have fun and I often feel like games are punishing me when that happens and I find myself doing sort of "risk management" and becoming a hermit in the game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deestan@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disclaimer: not always

Character stats, commonly called "RPG elements".

In games with low enough detail that I have to use my imagination, it makes sense to have a character constitution 10 increase to 15 and take 50% less damage from blunt weapons. It works perfectly in Rimworld, ADOM, Terraria and the like because you can't completely see what's happening, so when your character does low damage your imagination has room for him to hit badly or be partially blocked.

But in games with modern graphics and animations, it feels... off. An attack animation that shows someone swinging a sharp steel battleaxe perfectly and connecting with bare flesh at momentum, deals... no damage because the wielder has low strength and axe skill, while the target has a high armor value.

[–] leothehobbit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

IMO it goes triply so for games with guns, if regular enemies can just shrug off bullets to the head I have difficulty enjoying it cause it just makes the weapons feel weak

[–] Waker@lemmy.pt 4 points 1 year ago

Controversial opinion but I mostly hate crafting. I feel like it's a huge time sink just to make you waste time in the game. It's not content at all just mindless farming for no real reason.

There are games where the whole game revolves around it so you couldn't really remove it from those games. Minecraft is an example.

But I feel like every single game now has some kind of crafting mechanics. Mainly the F2P to get some kind of weird limitation that will either take you half a lifetime to accomplish or $5...

[–] whoiscraig@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

When you enter a level and the camera pans over every important thing in the level before you can move. I'm not an idiot. I can discover the level on my own. Stop holding my hand.

[–] neosheo@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crafting. I don't want to have to remember the recipe to stuff, then find out where it is, then keep going back to make it again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jurisprudentia@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most open-world games have areas on the map that are blank until you "explore" them by climbing a tower of some kind and "activating" that region on your map.

This results in trudging blindly into the middle of every new area, ignoring interesting stuff along the way and beelining to the tower just so you can see the damn map. It's an annoyingly unnatural way to explore.

I didn't even realize that I disliked it until I played Far Cry 6, which has a much more organic and immersive landmark discovery process. You learn locations of interest from readables and by talking to friendly NPCs that you encounter in the world.

In FC6 it's even thematic, since you're guerilla fighters passing intel along by word of mouth.

Edit: sp

[–] Ashen44@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 year ago

Death penalties. Any game that seriously penalizes you for dying is just so frustrating for me. I understand that there has to be some form of reason to not die but please, at worst just reload an earlier save for me (and make sure you have frequent autosaves too).

If I lose all my items on death I'm just reloading a save. If I have to respawn at a checkpoint ten thousand years away I'm going to be very mad. If I have to listen to someone monologue to me every time I die I'm refunding your game.

[–] phuntis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

crafting dear god I hate crafting if I ever find the person that introduced crafting into the triple a formula...

[–] Monkeyhog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I enjoy crafting if its a core game component, like in a survival game. But having to craft in order to upgrade your gear in Assassin's Creed was just tedious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Pay 2 win and excessive abuse of FOMO.

E.g. for the next two weeks you can purchase/grind for [character] with a LIMITED EDITION green hat!

It would be OK if such thing was behind an achievement and allowed to be gained later.

Some companies have gotten a little sneaky with it, like Microsoft with age of empires. They make their newly released DLC civs overpowered for two months then nerf it every time.

[–] Artyn@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate how in a lot of retro games water kills you instanly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Any sort of intense micromanagement of units, resources, etc. I've got like 16kb RAM in my brain. I can barely remember what I ate today lol.

Also, invisible walls that make absolutely no sense. Maybe just all invisible walls, really.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] peanuts4life@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Obligate stamina bars/circles for traversal. Just allow me to move at the speed of fun, and definitely don't make me stand still to recharge when climbing.

I think it's telling that death stranding, a game all about traversal, let's you sprint outright for as long as you want until well after your character's shoes literally fall off. The stamina bar is more a measure of abuse rather than a limit on your movement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ipha@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Card games that get bolted on to other genres. cough genshin cough

[–] tchotchony@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

What about open-world rpgs that get tucked onto card games? cough The Witcher 3 cough

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Escort missions and weapons breaking without a reasonably easy way to get/make more (glaring at you, Dead Island...)

[–] Manticore@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anything using timers, especially based on the clock. It just artificially adds playtime, and it also means I forget about them and lose track of what I was doing most the time, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] idiotexe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Fast travel that is just a game mechanic with no story ties in open world games.

Disclaimer: My main experience with games so far has been some Nintendo stuff, Fallout, and The Elder Scrolls.

Of what I've played I like Morrowind's fast travel system the most. You don't just open your map and click a button, you talk to people or use a spell/item. And NPCs mention these travel systems and story wise would use them.

I like Oblivion's (and to a lesser extent, Skyrim and the 3D Fallout's) the least. Time passes like your character walked to where you fast traveled but not much is timed so that has little effect on immersion. Too much of the journey has to have gaps filled in by the player's imagination because walking on the road normally has a lot of encounters and wandering off to check out random buildings and people. It encourages less exploration and taking some time with the game.

Obviously I want a balance, I don't want to be walking the same road with 2 wolf encounters a thousand times because it's between two areas I need to frequent. And I don't want 90% of my playtime to be traveling. But I also don't want to keep instantly fast traveling to all places and feel "lazy" and like I'm missing experiences and encounters. And I want more immersion. More character interaction instead of UI interaction.

[–] aedyr@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Hunger or thirst mechanics in anything that's not explicitly a survival game.

[–] m_talon@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Best hunger mechanics are the ones that don't harm your character when you're hungry, but you do get a buff for eating.

Valheim's like that. Don't want to eat? Fine. Go multiple days without and you'll still be ok. But if you want your hp to be all it can be, you'll want to eat up before going out to fight.

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Valheim's hunger / food-as-major-buffs mechanic is legit the best way I've seen any video game handle food.

[–] Artyn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup is a popular roguelike that removed its hunger mechanic and the game is so much better.

[–] Alkalyon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It's also the reason I DO NOT like survival games.

I would be ok with this mechanic if I didn't have to eat 10 bear steaks of 2 kilos each to last me for the next 10 minutes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeardedSingleMalt@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Radiant quests. You can never complete the game because of this, the quests are generic and repetitive and offer nothing but "stretch the playtime".

That and mechanics like "rando dragon attacks in Skyrim" and "City is under attack" from Fallout 4. I quit F4 because I was on my way to a mission and got the "city under attack notification, and on my way to defend another city was under attack.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Less of an issue nowadays but unclimbable knee-high walls which force you to go round. Always drove me crazy!

[–] UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Fallout 3 and NV had loads of this crap. A door is busted to hell and somehow locked but you need a key to unlock it. A stiff breeze will destroy the rest of the door.

[–] unsunny@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Probably simple, mindless side/fetch quests. Defeat enemies, get loot, run it back, rinse and repeat. It also is incredibly dry to watch as well as actually do yourself.

[–] HungryRoo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Escort quests. Stealth sections in games that aren't built around stealth would be close second.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cadellin@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Offline games which require an internet for no apparent reason has to be my pet peeve

[–] cnnrduncan@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah it guarantees that the game will be unplayable through legal means in a few years when it is no longer profitable to keep the servers running.

load more comments
view more: next ›