this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59710 readers
1980 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Travelers can opt out of facial recognition at US airports by requesting manual ID verification, though resistance or intimidation may occur.
  • Facial recognition poses privacy risks, including potential data breaches, misidentification, and normalization of surveillance.
  • The Algorithmic Justice League's "Freedom Flyers" campaign aims to raise awareness of these issues and encourage passengers to exercise their right to opt out.
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (5 children)

The last time I flew they did this, but there was a huge sign that said photos are immediately deleted after verification...is this not true?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago
[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I figure that by being in the airport there's enough footage of my face from security cameras that I didn't consent to (other than by being in public) that the scan of my face while boarding is moot.

Opting out of this face scan in particular is like using Chrome to browse the web, but searching with DuckDuckGo "for privacy reasons"

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's probably a huge difference in resolution.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but what's stopping them from just adding whatever high res cameras they want in their terminals and jet bridges anyway? How can we be sure they aren't already doing that? The only thing the face scan does that those cameras can't is require you to lower your mask.

[–] Spedwell@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

As the article points out, TSA is using this tech to improve efficiency. Every request for manual verification breaks their flow, requires an agent to come address you, and eats more time. At the very least, you ought not to scan in the hopes that TSA metrics look poor enough they decide this tech isn't practical to use.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but what's stopping them from just adding whatever high res cameras they want in their terminals and jet bridges anyway?

Budget probably.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

There is a reason I wear a large hat and a mask when walking through the airport and generally keep my head tilted down. I also wear large sunglasses, but that's as much because every airport has at least one giant wall that is nothing but glass and inevitably I will walk around a corner and get face fucked by the sun. The privacy is just a bonus 😅

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago

I find stupid to give away my biometric data to everyone asking for it just because I give it away once in exchange of my passport, but I guess that's just me.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Poison pill their data instead.

  1. Go to www.thispersondoesnotexist.com

  2. Generate a person

  3. Print it

  4. Scan it when asked for facial data

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 0 points 4 months ago (5 children)

5. Get hand-picked by the TSA for involuntary colonoscopy

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NewAgeOldPerson@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I went thru naturalization process. They have everything already. Including DNA, retina scan, etc. So I opted for Clear. Global Entry as well. They have it all already. May as well fast track going thru customs.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

Clear is run by a 3rd party company. TSA pre-check is run by the government. TSA pre-check comes free with Global Entry, you just need to sign up for it.

[–] Imhotep@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

For international flights, US citizens can opt out but foreign nationals have to participate in face scanning, [with some exceptions]

I had no idea we were already at that point.

always wanted to visit the US. I guess that won't happen then.

I refuse to participate in this dystopia. But I'm a little worried this will make me a recluse

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Trust me you're already a recluse relative to most by being on here. If you observe what passes for a "normal" "person" these days, they will endlessly scroll algorithmic ai-generated incomprehensible horrors on Tiktok, then purchase something through an ad from temu, they do not think. They are gone.

But once you stop worrying that you may be saying no to experiences too much purely on principle, then you're free to go even further and eradicate surveillance capitalism influence from your life altogether. One day you can ascend to even go smartphone-free.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

One day you can ascend to even go smartphone-free.

Ascended to that in late 2014 because using a smartphone was a trigger for my anxiety.

Back to using those since 2020 because of WhatsApp calls, apps for every shit and such being needed in life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Emerald@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

they will endlessly scroll algorithmic ai-generated incomprehensible horrors on Tiktok

How is that much different from scrolling Lemmy? They are both social media

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (5 children)
[–] Warp10Lizard@startrek.website 0 points 4 months ago

Agreed, but they'll inevitably fuck those up too.

[–] al4s@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

For distances >600km, flying is usually 4x-10x faster at a similar price. At least in and around Germany. I assume in the US trains compare way worse, also because the distances are way larger.

Examples: "Normal" example: Stuttgart (Germany) -> Amsterdam (Netherlands) Train: 11h 10min - 241€ Plane: 1h 20min - 225€

Best case scenario for train in Germany at around that distance (because there's a direct connection): München -> Berlin Train: 3h 54min - 167€ Plane: 1h 5min - 226€

[–] GoogleSellsAds@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're too smart for this site. I too love taking trains across both the Pacific and Atlantic oceans!

[–] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

I'd actually love to take some sort of sea train, underground tunnel or floating death wave train one day. It wouldn't be relaxing, peaceful, or cheap. But it would be an adventure.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Hour vs. hour it's the best form of transportation

You get more space, there's no TSA, you don't get charged for bringing luggage, you can carry on liquids, you get leg room, the wifi is decent.

But if I'm traveling a really far distance... For example, if I'm going from California to New York I'd rather go by plane. Going by train for that seems to be pretty horrible. America is in desperate need of a ground transportation that can get from California to New York quickly.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ealoe@ani.social 0 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Dumbass article, if you go to an airport your face is all over the security cameras and the checkpoints delete your image immediately after scanning so they are the least of your worries.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I did this during an international trip last year coming back into the country. The guy mostly seemed confused and kind of suspicious, but it was nbd.

They will potentially take you out of line to a side room to hand you off to someone else. It seemed to be an area where they deal with any oddball kind of things. There was a lady ahead of me who was more raucus and upset about some issue with her ID. The guy who checked mine mainly seemed kind of bemused, like it was unusual.

Be prepared for "We have the biometric data from your photo already, why do you care?"

You're not obligated to give them a super detailed justification. Just remain polite and unconfrontational, and explain that you prefer not use the system as long as the right remains afforded to you to opt out.

(Note, this right only extends to US citizens)

[–] King3d@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I refuse to go through the body scanners, but the last time I went through the airport there wasn’t anyone trying to opt-out. I seriously doubt if the radiation perv scanner doesn’t get people to do anything, this won’t either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›