this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
166 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This always makes me laugh. Somewhere after 2000 I had my gender and sexuality renamed by a really small, small part of the population. Who gets offended as hell if I say I don't care for it. I can easily make them mad as hell just by mentioning a few thing they don't like but can't be argued. But somehow my dislike of their renaming me is not justified but their presumption to do so for everyone is.

[–] CreativeShotgun@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nobody renamed anything, we just called it what it was more concisely than just saying "normal" lol

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Sure you made up a new system because the old one offended you. Same thing but hypocrisy always is just the same shit different day.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Equality feels like oppression, to the privileged.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Imma take issue with this.

You've rephrased, and essentially reformulated Paolo Friere's famous and enlightening quote, "Equality feels like oppression to the oppressor." Does having privilege make one an oppressor? In some cases, it most certainly does but I would disagree that coming from privilege makes one an oppressor: history is full of examples of people from the oppressive ruling classes risking or sacrificing everything to fight against oppression and restore equality. I am privileged but equality would not feel like oppression to me; or if it did I would have to self criticize harshly since I spend so much of my time and energy fighting against oppression and for equality. And this is what your rephrasing has done, it has eliminated the class aspect from Friere's formulation; furthermore it isn't connected to anything. So when you say this in isolation you create a privileged other. Friere on the other hand was fully aware of the dialectic between the oppressed and their oppressors, and scientifically worked out his thesis: through dehumanization of the oppressed, the oppressors lost their own humanity. While oppression had to be fought, first the oppressed had to restore their own humanity by restoring their own subjectivity. Once they had liberated their minds, and in fact through this process they would become organized in such a way to organize their bodies as well. This is the perceived nadir of the oppressors, the equality that feels like oppression. However, in its final stage this equality restores the humanity of the oppressor, in fact it is the ontological mission of the oppressed to restore the humanity of the oppressors. this final synthesis of the dialectic is not inevitable however, and the whole enterprise is based on education. "When education is not liberating," he said, "it is the dream of the oppressed to become the oppressor."

I don't know what that deleted comment was, probably some hateful bs, but was your comment intended to educate, and set others on the path of education?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm more rephrasing 'loss of privilege feels like oppression,' but that sure is a wall of text about something nobody said.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just because you don't know where it comes from doesnt mean it isn't connected

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just because you want it to be what I meant doesn't mean I care that it's what you're rambling about.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I looked it up, it appears in a lot of places though its origin is unknown. So you picked it up from somewhere. Definitely not your fault for mangling what is obviously a distorted Friere quote, though it remains mangled and now a part of public consciousness. I still have the same reservations about it and I wish you would consider reading Pedagogy of the Oppressed rather than dismiss what I'm saying and probably keep repeating this. But you're right, it was a waste of time.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

'Don't say X.'

Okay, I didn't.

[–] cybermass@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I am cisgender

I don't understand why that's a bad thing?

I don't understand a lot of this political gender shit tbh. I'm just chillin

[–] Juice@midwest.social 0 points 4 months ago

Its not a bad thing

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 4 months ago

Some people (I even know one of these types) think "cis" is some kind of slur. It can cause some humorous incidents even, like that time in chemistry class they were forced to use the word cis and trans to describe chemical structures lmao.

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Samesies. Here for the support and the dank memes. Not offended to get labeled. I'm also questioning if most cisgender people take offense to the label. I feel like most wouldn't. Maybe we're talking about the minority that gets triggered by words that they don't understand. I hope y'all don't rope the whole cis culture in with the haters, because you don't have to be queer to understand the plight of non-binary peoples. Just sayin'.

[–] cybermass@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago

Yeah I mean I definitely don't understand the whole non-binary thing, to me it seems silly. But they aren't hurting anyone, or affecting my life in any way, so why care?

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›