We should give them universal admin privileges.
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
59587 readers
5279 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
checks username
Well this seems like a guy I can trust!
man, I do my homelab for hobby and better performance. this is bonus.
disclaimer: didn't read the article past the paywall fade out. and I'm too lazy to circumvent
Home routing in this case refers to IP tunneling when roaming.
you mean like ipsec or vpn? I have been playing with that too for connecting my brother's computers to my self host services.
Lol. Uh, good?
Came here to pose exactly this. While I support proper and ethical law enforcement, the Snowden leak clearly showed just how unethical my own government is willing to be to enforce laws. So whatever tools I have at my disposal to prevent unlawful search and seizure, I will use them.
tents fingers
Oh no.... Anyway
Tough. Shit.
It's almost as if police need to get a warrant to wiretap people, and can't just do illegal wiretaps on unencrypted data. I can see why the EU may want to consider implementing processes for cross-border wiretaps, though.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Oh my! Encryption makes it harder to snoop uninvited into things that should not concern them in the first place! Shocking!
Good!
That's going to be a recurring theme. Law enforcement starts scanning one thing, businesses, criminals and citizens start using something else. They'll have to forbid everything that's not open, but by then legal businesses stop using the net because all their secrets get stolen.
One of these guys went on to be a very wholesome beloved actor.
And the other........I assume is still alive.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Warning: non-transparent walls, window blinds and door locks prevent lawful interception and surveillance - how are the authorities supposed to know you're not doing something naughty in there?
how are the authorities supposed to know you’re not doing something naughty in there?
Humans are actually supposed to do naughty things. Otherwise they'd be worried about demography
Clothing hides weapons! So do fat folds. Kill all the fat people and go naked for a crime free world in the new authoritarian bridge between Nazis and Stalinists for a wonderful Europe.
There are places a skinny naked person can hide things. What do we do about that?
Kill them all. If your butt cheeks touch in the middle you get the antisemitic/Palestinian treatment. Would you like to die by rocket, bomb, on the hood of a car, as a joke, career suicide, anonymous mass grave, student failure with no future, self emulation, militant untrained police, starvation, Kremlin backed Right faction first world extremist regime mob of fucktards, or randomly one of the above? Heil Europe!
I think they meant inside
Mandatory random cavity searches.
It's the only way to keep society safe!
lawful interception
Idk bout that. Usually you get a warrant for wiretapping and then you pay someone to install it. If they are trying to break encryption or identifying users, that means they inherently are doing something the law does not favor.
Let's also acknowledge that if encryption is bad because it cannot be broken, that means encryption is pretty good at what it should do.
Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.
Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.
DeCSS.
If they are trying to break encryption or identifying users, that means they inherently are doing something the law does not favor.
They've been trying to change that law multiple times for over a decade.
Breaking encryption is never something you do for the right reasons.
Uhhh ransomware?
I read this the other day.. the issue they face is on the warrant side, cross border investigations have a 120 day lead time. So instead of actually integrating police and making sure time sensitive investigations get treated as such... They whine about PET.
EuroPol seems to be something like the FBI.. who operate across all US states. But in the EU the countries are still very separate and require such ridiculous things as proof and due process. And that's fine... It just needs to be sped up.
Europol is merely a clearing house, standards process and coordinating agency for how national police forces work together across the EU states. It has very, very little power. Unfortunately.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Cool let's add a backdoor to all routers and gateways, no way it would be exploited by our enemies
Or exploited by the government
I think post above may have that one covered off already
Same thing
Yeah. He said "our enemies". We're saying the same thing.
Look at the phrasing too, they say it like they have the right to see our information and we're (the citizens) breaking that untold social safety contract.
Transparency should go both ways, no encryption for the people, no encryption for the government z it's only fair.
I think the ideal government has to be as transparent as possible so that the common people can control their government effectively.
load more comments
(2 replies)
More backdoors?
This time deliberate!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Good, privacy is why they are being used. The government has plenty of legal ways to invade a person's privacy, perhaps they should consider using them.
Good. 'Lawful' interception is total nonsense. They'd have a camera up everyone's ass if they could.
As it is our TVs bloody listen to us....1984 is here.
Good! The government has no business in peoples' homes.
PET? Not the bottle i guess.
Privacy Enhancing Technologies. A blanket term for anything protecting your identity (Onion, VPN, etc.) I feel like the people asking for this either have a very limited technical understanding of it or completely different motives. You can't ban encryption. What they could do is ban VPN services from officially operating or certain protocols but that would mostly hit your regular user.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Some obvious things giving anonymity and plausible deniability but also zero-knowledge proofs and such.
PET technologies = Privacy Enhancing Technologies technologies
My main man, you deserve the wall for even attempting that shit, now you're gonna complain we're making it hard?
Think of the children!
I fixed the bulleted.
-
Home routing and encryption technologies are making ~~lawful interception~~ spying on innocent civilians harder for Europol
-
PET-enabled home routing allows for secure communication, ~~hindering~~ preventing law enforcement’s ability to intercept and ~~monitor~~ spy on the communications of innocent civilians
-
Europol suggests solutions such as disabling PET technologies and implementing cross-border interception standards to address the issue of Europol not knowing how to do their jobs without resorting to Orwellian dystopian techniques
-
PET technologies does exactly what it's intended to do--protect the innocent civilian from the prying eyes of the not innocent bodies that are hellbent on eroding privacy and security
I get that that’s bad and that shouldn’t be.
But there just have been too many cases of unlawful interception (NSA and Criminal). So I personally don’t think we should move back away from encryption
view more: next ›