this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
42 points (76.9% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The 'Real Time' host ran down his issues with the Greta Gerwig film, while insisting "I'm not the one who's out of step."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 74 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Anone who thinks it's man hating hasn't actually seen the movie. It has as much to say about the state of modern men as it does women.

At the start of the film it plainly states, out loud, in actual dialog, that for Barbie, every day is the best day ever, but for Ken, it's only a good day if Barbie looks at him.

Ken's adrift. He's the ultimate representation of a friendzoned incel. He has no purpose in life other than as a Barbie accessory with as much agency as her swimming pool or Dream Car.

When he finds that purpose, it's toxic. But saying the film is "man hating" is denying Ken's search for meaning in a Barbie world.

[–] Toouwuforu@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I agree with you and I think there is even more to evaluate in Ken’s search for meaning.

Remember that he’s ultimately lost even in the real (“mans”) world.

There are two things here:

  1. Feminism left men behind. “Maybe every night didn’t have to be a girls night.” And we have a lot of catching up to do on both sides to bring parity to the situation.

  2. Ken expresses his exhaustion at having to be in control of everything. Much of his anxiety is rooted in a patriarchal worldview that makes him responsible for everything due to the lie that men must control the world.

As a man, husband and father myself I can so identify with that journey. I was abused in my career by managers that wanted me to fight my friends for promotions and I’ve burned out several times due to unrealistic expectations that I had of myself which were ingrained in me by a patriarchal culture. It’s very tiring to be ‘the boss’ and I’ve learned that sharing the load does not weaken me, it makes me stronger,

I think that the film is actually very kind to men. It’s saying: ‘You don’t have to do everything alone.’

I honestly wonder if women are ready though. Like I said and like the movie illustrates: there is a lot to do on both sides. Equity has a cost and I know many women who still find sanctuary in the slipstream of the men in their lives because taking that step out of the shadow takes as much bravery as admitting that you can’t be in control of everything all the time.

[–] mancy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I honestly wonder if women are ready though.

Aw thanks so much for your concern. 🙄

[–] Toouwuforu@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fact that that’s what you took from my post kind of illustrates my point. Albeit ironically.

[–] mancy@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your post took an entirely feminist issue and made it about men again.

“Did feminism leave men behind” is something that only men would ponder about.

“I wonder if women are ready” is another can of condescending mess. Women are put in this box of patriarchy BY MEN, so instead of taking away the box and recognizing that it shouldn’t be there in the first place, you ask if women are ready to come out of it. We’re not children that you put in a timeout corner.

You ARE Ken. In a sanctuary for Barbies, you find some rhetoric to latch onto and try to make it about your plight too.

[–] Toouwuforu@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The message of the film is that everyone is worse off due to patriarchy. Not just women.

Men need to learn that meeting halfway is not a loss.

Women need to stand ground and also invite men into a changed world.

You’re still trying to make every night a girls night.

The film is about feminism reaching a state of maturity and your anger here is proving to us all that my concerns are on point. I think that there are many men and yes, many women too who are not ready.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kichae@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feminism left men behind

I'm sorry, but WTF? I don't know how you look at feminism with any kind of understanding and walk away with that impression.

The fact that, as men, we've collectively ignored feminism's every attempt to help us, while whining that women are helping themselves and each other, doesn't mean that feminism has left us behind. It means we've refused help and to help ourselves.

[–] Toouwuforu@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

I guess that’s one way to see it. It’s not the message of the movie though. The film chooses, like I do, to take a view that men have some catching up to do and that feminism itself can play a role in this by helping to carve out equitable roles.

I don’t claim to know everything about feminism. I’m just pointing out (as the film has too) that this is new territory for a lot of men. You can sit there and shout “Why haven’t you helped yourselves??!” …or you can help and try to build a progressive society together.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 year ago

I agree. I think the film does a great job peeling back the bias of sexism and making it, not a problem with men, but with humanity. Something we can all commiserate with and all benefit from working at making things better.

All of this. I'm not pro third wave feminism but I absolutely loved the messaging about the toxic state of Ken.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The movie posters that I've seen literally say that in two sentences. Even the song says she's a Barbie girl in a Barbie world.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’s really turned into one of his catch phrases: A Whiny Little Bitch. Sixty some years of white men controlling everything and the second it’s not overwhelmingly male you can’t make a movie about how it was the vast majority of the time? Get the fuck out of here with your insecure bullshit. You have no reason to whine about people blaming the patriarchy. Don’t be a tone-deaf asshole and you can go through life as a straight white man with little to no pushback for being so. Way less than women continue to get for just being women.

[–] OpenStars@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I haven't watched it yet, but knowing his past work I can already say: his profit motive may suggest otherwise. Engagement culture works for an extremely wide audience, and his base seems to be people that get pissed off by the things that he says, to some large measure potentially purely b/c it pisses them off? That is to say that it is hard to convince someone of something when their job depends on them not understanding it. Okay, now I am ready to go watch it!:-D

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Correction, it's a billion dollar preachy, man-hating zombie lie.

Who the fuck cares what Bill Maher whines?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I watched him 10 years ago when he was slightly more middle just edgy. Goddamn is he gasping to stay relevant, who the hell watches him anymore? Just an annoying douche now.

[–] Ddubz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The one person I know that still watches Bill Maher is a guy that says he's a libertarian. But he's a libertarian in the way that a college freshman in 2005 was a libertarian.

[–] dreadgoat@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's really the same as he's always been, just the more you watch and listen the more you find out about his questionable views.

I disagree with him on most things, but I respect him as a pundit because you can really tell that he's providing opinions that are truly his own. He's a conservative democrat that everybody hates, and he ignores the pressure to fall in line with either side. He's pro-military, pro-gun, pro-surveillance, but also all for drug legalization, medicare for all, and vehemently supports separation of church and state. It's a weird mix and even inconsistent at times (he loves individual freedom but hates women so abortion is tricky for him!) but you at least have to admit he's one of the last remaining pundits that isn't a mouthpiece for politicians.

[–] neomis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree about him not changing. He’s always had 1 or 2 topics that were a bit crazy (anti medicine, over the top islamaphobe, etc), but generally he had people on from both sides (mostly) and played a biased moderator. Now he’s a panelist as well and he has to be right. More than that he’s old man yells at cloud and gets super butthurt when anyone points it out.

[–] dreadgoat@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's that the world has changed and left him behind. He was a racist misogynist 30 years ago, but back then the system enforced those things to his satisfaction. The systemic oppression of people he doesn't like has been challenged more and more over the past few decades, and he takes issue with that.

It makes sense for him to be the angriest "progressive" in the world if you think about it. All the progress we've made has been the things he DOESN'T want (metoo, BLM, etc) and none of the things he does want (healthcare, secularism)

This is why a lot of old people "become more conservative." No they don't. They just stew in their shitty comfort zones while the world around them moves forward.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] girl@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s certainly patriarchy-hating. If men find that personally offensive and “man-hating”, they should check themselves

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Right? Patriarchy is male supremacism. It should be hated.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I see this as an endorsement!

Remember that this fuckwit said that woke was horrible because RDJ couldn't release a movie where he plays a Mexican and that woke controlled everything. When someone replied that women just lost the right to get an abortion in the supreme Court to put into perspective who really has control here his reply was an emphatic: "I don't care because the movie would have been awesome!!"

[–] vanontom@geddit.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maher completely lost focus after T**** was kicked out of the White House. Last I checked, he was obsessed with GOP culture war nonsense (woke, gen z, etc). Spends valuable time on show whining about personal problems (like his mansion's solar panels). Increasingly out of touch, or unable to care about important issues. Needs to be liked more than ever (esp. certain celebs, see Musk interview). Extremely sensitive about his age. He'll be off HBO soon, unless daddy CEO loves him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Like this is the first time, the last time, or even the best time that this will happen. Because women-hating preaching androphilic testerone action flicks have only existed since ...

/checks clipboard

... since the Iliad which has been translated 10 times again in the past 20 years alone on top of the hundreds for the past thousands of years.

Fucking SO What ? So what there is a movie that is GO GO Team GIRLS RULE; BOYZ DROOL.

So ? I do still not feel oppressed by the movie. It is funny. These boys in the media are actually making it funnier, to be honest.

Talk about fragile masculinity. Girls have a movie that they like and is empowering and fragile idiots like this melt down. You know what manly men do? They let people enjoy things. Hell, they dress up in pink and go with their friends and enjoy it, and don't get triggered so easily.

[–] bentsea@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting how Maher shows how much closer he is to being Ben Shapiro than being someone worth paying attention to.

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He’s always been an asshole. He’s liberal, but he’s in his 60s and it shows.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Amen. I got sick of him back when he and I were both a lot fucking younger. Just because our politics aren't super far apart doesn't mean he isn't a snide, arrogant little fuck.

Hell, the way he pushes identity politics snidely and arrogantly is part of why I can't stand him. Like, I wouldn't wish him harm, but I would be very glad if he retired.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

His flexible quickness of wit was incredibly impressive in the ‘80s and early-‘90s.

But, he’s become brittle. You can see it in his interviews and conversations now, where he often makes interlocutors repeat something before understanding it and responding to it, even though it was said clearly.

I suspect he’s lost a few steps and is running mostly on muscle-memory these days. He has lost the flexibility of thinking to make truly insightful jokes; he relies instead of stereotypes and is irritated that those stereotypes are increasingly being rejected by the left.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The interesting part of his shows back then wasn't him, but the group that was put together to talk about issues of the time. When he wouldn't butt in with his own thoughts. Terrible host, better hosts spark conversation and let the guests talk.

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

The movie also isn't even Boyz Drool, it's a critique of radicalization that can occur to aimless men, and ends with the message that equality is preferred over a matriarchy or patriarchy.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You might as well go right back to Gilgamesh, literally the earliest written saga ever discovered, predating the Iliad by at least 1200 years.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Let's not ignore Enheduana, than, either. But, yes, thank you. According to you, I am even righter.

[–] Rottcodd@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

...while insisting "I'm not the one who's out of step."

That's the funniest thing I've read all day.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Figures Bill doesn't get the movie. He's an out of touch douche-canoe who attempts to stay relevant by mentioning pot every once in a while in his opening monolog.

[–] norske@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Says the guy who used to fuck an actual preachy, man-hating zombie, Ann Coulter.

[–] Zellith@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Dude, I'm eating.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Must have been like fucking a dead fish filled with ice and hatred.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Wait, what?

Bill Maher hooked up with Ann Coulter?

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

This dude is totally content with 300,000 years of subjugation of women by men, but has problems when a single feminist movie comes out. Comedy can only make fun of the other, apparently. Soon as you (men) get made fun of, they're all up in arms.

Get with the program or get out of the fucking way.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Maher has entirely missed the entire point of the movie if that's what he's getting out of it.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Bill Maher is an out of step snowflake

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven’t watched it yet, but it sounds interesting, so I will.

But if women have had to put up with decades of movies with a “men big, hard, and clever/women stupid” theme, I’m sure men can tolerate one film where they’re the important ones.

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's funny as hell too, I was cracking up all movie. Really fun ride.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ll make an effort to watch it then.

I ended up watching it, and I'd have to agree. I ain't a third wave feminist and didn't like a lot of the messaging about the war of the sexes, but I don't think that kept it from being a hilarious film. The feminist messaging wasn't even that heavy-handed until the end.

And while MGTOW-adjacent (I find the movement a bit harmful TBH), I do think their messaging about being a simp was pretty good. I approve of anti-simp messaging.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

The audience watching Bill Maher now must be complete idiots. He tells stupid stories now. He's on that stupid all the time. The man's lost it, but clearly has enough stupid eyes and ears on him to keep going.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Maher has always been a right wing plant.

load more comments
view more: next ›