this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
4578 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I know some don't it, but I just can't hear the word "creatives" as anything other than silicon valley speak for the source of the content they sell. It feels dehumanizing.

Particularly in this case, it's Adobe, so you can just call them artists, designers, photographers, etc.

Or, ya know, just users.

[–] CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In fairness, it’s Wired who called them creatives, while Adobe called them artists.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's pretty bad. It's like calling people "the talent".

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Or calling all kinds of art "content".

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago

So if artists are “creatives”, what does that make them? “Exploiters”?

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago

Remember when consumers where customers?

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Trust us bro!

[–] 555@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Affinity Photo, Affinity Designer, Affinity Publisher

Sorry, no linux versions.

[–] neo@lemy.lol 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would be so happy if there was a Linux version!

[–] 555@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’d settle for anything better that GIMP 🤮

[–] rndll@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] 555@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t that primarily for painting? Like procreate on tablets?

[–] rndll@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

It is, but the interface is actually much closer to Photoshop CS. For basic editing, I'd work with Krita rather than GIMP any day.

[–] MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wish I could switch to Affinity, Publisher just isn’t quite there yet in a print production environment.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How so? Genuinely curious what’s missing as someone who tried it on a job, and loved it.

I just sent a job to print yesterday and the printer didn’t bat an eye.

Are we talking specific types of printing? Like booklets or runs with specific imposition needs or something else?

I think ultimately it will depend on what one needs printed. It would easily meet most common printing requirements as far as I can tell.

[–] MrSebSin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You guessed it with booklets or anything long format really.

As a 20+ year Adobe user, I tried switching about a year ago. Seems like the only way to give it proper go, was to dive in head first and force myself to exclusively use Affinity. Of course there’s a bit of a (frustrating) learning curve but overall it went pretty smooth. I genuinely thought I was going to make it work.

That was until I had to setup a 40 page catalog. Ran into various minor issues, but not insurmountable. IIRC the main issue that ultimately made me go back to InDesign was the handling of support assets and glitches as the catalog got more “heavy” with stuff.

I think I would have stuck with Affinity if I could go back and forth between Publisher/InDesign, but I couldn’t take what I started with and finish in the other app.

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

Thanks for the reply. Makes sense. I haven’t had any jobs recently that would push us there.

CC is also priced low enough we can sign back up for a month if we need it.

One feature set of CC I’ll miss is the libraries functionality working across all the apps. Someone on the team needs a client asset in any app ? (AE/ID/PS/AI) There it is.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Because they will. They literally will.

Adobe is one of the most awful, insidious, evil corporations in the software space and they have done absolutely nothing to claw back even a tiny shred of good faith.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This seems to happen every time a technology company grows beyond some threshold of size/market share/revenue. I can’t think of a single exception.

[–] bcnelson@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Valve has done a pretty good job. Probably because of their ownership model

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Valve is still a private company. If they ever made an IPO then they would be screwed.

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The stock market literally forces companies to be evil. Once you do an IPO, you're contractually obliged to be shitty in order to bring higher revenues.

[–] Crow@mander.xyz 0 points 5 months ago

Not just the stock market but i’m pretty sure it’s a legal precedent that companies must prioritize shareholders over anyone else.

[–] rndll@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Autodesk would like to have a word.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Oracle and Amazon enter the chat

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Stallman was right

I wonder what state FOSS replacements for Adobe software would be in if a significant percentage of Adobe users used their subscription money to donate to FOSS replacements instead.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The ironic thing is that if it weren't for free software, the entire AI industry would likely be a decade behind where it is today, if not more.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's true for all IT industries. All IT stands on the shoulders of FOSS.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

FOSS has won, it's just that some people don't know that yet.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

The entire industry is held up by the collective imaginations of rich people pretending that FOSS hasn't won.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 5 months ago

There's a very significant open-source AI industry, too. Krita's got a great Stable Diffusion plugin that lets you generate and inpaint right in the editor, using entirely local models.

[–] Hupf@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

Is this one of those "yeah, we legally gave ourselves permission but trust us we won't use it" cases that also commonly happens in politics?

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well change your fucking ToS back you rats!

[–] lapping6596@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't have access to the whole article, but this video says they did.

https://youtu.be/HRzGE1hzefc

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

Hm, okay. I personally still wouldn't trust them with anything, as they're clearly willing to go as far as they possibly can.

I understand that in the corporate world, switching away from Adobe isn't as easy.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

"Lying Shit Heads Say Lies" More Breaking News at 11

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Does anyone else find the term "creatives" to be so damn condescending? It'd be like calling executives, "Admins" or "powerpointers"

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 months ago

Oh that reminds me... I've bought the affinity suite some days ago and forgot to install. They have a massive price reduction at the moment to fish in Adobe's muddy waters for disgruntled customers.

[–] Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago

Never ever trust a corporation. In case of Adobe, they don't give a shit about your creative work. That's not what they are in business for. They are in business to increase revenue and reduce expense, by any means necessary. Just like all corporations. Their customers are but a product for them that they can manipulate how they see fit. Capitalism demands profit over people. Never trust a corporation.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"We won't train AI on artists' work...this quarter."

~Adobe probably

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago

Don't trust capitalists

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I tried Affinity Publisher 2 the other day and it convinced me to pull the plug on Adobe and switch on the Affinity suite. Everything was straightforward and far more intuitive than InDesign ever was (which itself was far better than Quark Xpress before it).

I bought the Affinity Suite, exported all my Creative Cloud libraries (they’re just zip files with a different extension), copied all my Creative Cloud files to our self-hosted Nextcloud and off we went.

I promptly cancelled creative cloud. As I’ve said before, I’ll miss generative fill in photoshop - it was very good.

It’ll also take a while to figure out / learn Fusion as a replacement for AE but having spent a lot of time with Shake in the past, it’ll be fine.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago

Would be more interesting if they had a Linux version.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 0 points 5 months ago

We won't do that, we promise.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

release your training materials or GTFO

100% the scenario will be this: Adobe will hire a company to provide "licensed training material" to their AI tools then it will be laundered with a contract that says "uphold our code of conduct or something" and then when it comes out it won't even violate the contract it will just be a shocked pikachu face and a stern sounding PR rebuke.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

"...for now"