this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
4890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It was nice knowing Raspberry Pi while they lasted. Going to suck losing something that has changed the homegrown embedded system hobby forever.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sooner or later capitalism ruins everything.

[–] NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (20 children)

Then it's a good thing that no countries have pure capitalism for their economy.

We need regulation on corporations to keep them in check.

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I can’t wait till those regulations get enforced.

[–] NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

If you're having trouble finding when it is enforced you can look at websites like this one that list out the many cases brought up against companies (for the U.S. at least).

http://ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The fact that regulations make capitalism less dangerous doesn't mean that capitalism is fine as long as its regulated.

Hand grenades have a tonne of safety features, but you wouldn't let your kid play with one. "Safer" isn't the same thing as "safe".

[–] NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What would you propose as being better than the mix of capitalism and socialism that almost every country already has for their economy?

Both extremes lead to terrible outcomes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I'd let my kid play with a grenade. Then again, I don't have kids by choice, so to imply I had kids would be to imply that at some point something went terribly wrong. But rectified in the most absurd method possible.

Plus, you couldn't go to jail for child abuse, because what parent is "double checking" that the grenade he's playing with is in fact a toy? BECAUSE WHERE THE HELL DOES THIS 3 YEAR OLD GET A GRENADE???

That logic would track in court. A very sad, very bizzare set of circumstances. That theres no way you could blame the parent for.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] dvdnet62@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

So, what are the alternatives?

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I got a 'LePotato' a few years back when Pi had stock issues, and it worked quite well as a Pi 4 clone.

[–] pezmaker@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yep, using one to run clipper for my 3d printer with armbian as the OS. It's been rock solid for me. There obviously some adaptation and discovery when trying to use the io as it's similar-but-not the same as the raspberry pi io and manipulating it is not the same. But it works, it was available, it was competitively cheap, and it's been stable

Plus I get to say I'm running my 3d printer on a potato

[–] astanix@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !sbcs@lemux.minnix.dev

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think Pine64 is pretty cool.

[–] impure9435@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Unfortunately they use Chinese CPUs (made by Rockchip)

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which Pi alternatives don't?

[–] impure9435@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago

Libre Computer offers some SBCs with Amlogic CPUs. I think the Le Potato might be the most popular one. I just ordered an Alta AML-A311D-CC. I'm really excited to try out how well it performs!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

There's tons of similar SBC's out there from Chinese manufacturers, like Orange Pi, Banana Pi, etc; usually using mediatek RISC-V or rockchip ARM processors. They're all poorly supported on the software and documentation side though and take more work to get going, which has always been where Raspberry shined- nobody else has made embedded computing so easily accessible with click and go OS options and continuous kernel maintenance.
Probably the only board closest to software parity is the pine64 boards... but it's still not quite as good.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is the key point for alternatives. None seem to have the community and support (docs, s/w quality etc) that is remotely close to that of the Raspberry Pi.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They have more features though, like extra Ethernet, PCIe brackets and M2 slots on the board

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Those features don't mean shit if you can't use a modern OS after a couple of years.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Everyone here seems pretty negative on this news. Any particular reason?

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They think that it's gonna ruin the company

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Raspberry pi foundation was launched as a charity, and the end goal was to produce a ton of very cheap computers to help children learn about programming. Since then, it has been soo ubiquitous for embedded stuff that for the last couple of years they have basically become unaffordable for the very audience they were intended for. Now they are seeking an ipo because they are used in everything, except as cheap computers for children.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

Going public introduces shareholders that prioritizes return on investment as opposed to making technology and knowledge about technology accessible for many.

It doesn't always end this way but often enough to worry about it...

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

In Tech, an IPO means the business is market ready to be sold off in pieces, ie stocks. The people who buy the product don't care what it does, they use the product maker as a vehicle to more growth and profit. Typically that means the people who now own the business make poor choices about cost cutting, like off shoring support and removing unuseful documentation while removing people with critical tribal knowledge about processes. Each step the new owner takes will be to make the business more profitable, and in the world of business, the only thing they care about are the numbers and not the environment or people that created those numbers.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Every time a company goes public, they become more and more profitable until the only way to continue on that trajectory is to worsen their own product.

Think they'll still be selling the Pico for $4 or the Zero for $15 after they're reporting to shareholders?

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Big pharma companies jack up the prices of life saving medicine that's been affordable for decades and don't lose a bit of sleep. You bet your ass a hobby electronics company will jack up prices as far as they think they can.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Price is one thing but the push for returns on investments is massive, this means that it's time to start cutting corners on everything (except maybe marketing! Yea!). Quality, repairability, and innovation all start to crumble.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Mostly that IPOs put companies into 'infinite growth mode' which is obviously impossible, so their product just degrades over time. They can't just do 'good enough' anymore.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Also the reason why every company that is consistently 'good' is run privately. If you answer to nobody but yourself you have a lot more room for long term plans

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Costco might be an exception here, though may degrade once the leading team dies or exits.

[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Well, the founder made death threats and I for one believe him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The real sad thing is that you and the person you replied to are talking like "publicly traded" and "private" are the only two options, because worker cooperatives are so rare everybody forgets about them.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For me anything "private" just means you can't buy shares publicly. Worker cooperatives would be included in that (since you need to be a worker to own a "share")

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There are a high proportion of far-left types on here. I could see them wanting something to be government-owned or something. But wanting a company to be privately-owned rather than publicly-owned seems odd to me.

And the "enshittification" comments seem odd too.

"Enshittification" isn't some sort of catch-all term for a company doing worse. Doctorow coined it to refer to a point where a company that had been losing money to grow a customer base ends the rapid-growth phase and starts monetizing that base.

That makes business sense for some companies with low marginal costs and high fixed costs, and especially where there is network effect, like social media companies.

But here, the company is profitable, and not unreasonably so. Like, they don't have a monetization phase that they need to transition to.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/06/11/raspberry-pi-is-now-a-public-company-as-its-shares-pops-after-ipo-pricing/?guccounter=1

In 2023 alone, Raspberry Pi generated $266 million in revenue and $66 million in gross profit.

Raspberry Pi priced its IPO on the London Stock Exchange on Tuesday morning at £2.80 per share, valuing it at £542 million, or $690 million at today’s exchange rate.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We're mostly negative on publicly traded companies because their ceo is legally obligated to squeeze blood from a stone or they quite literally will get sued by the shareholders, plenty of examples out there. The exceptions are usually there because the previous owners wrote contracts, etc to help keep the company as it was prior but even then it only works for so long. Check out Ben and Jerry's and their whole debacle on the subject.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Going publicly traded fucks every company up with nextquarter-itis.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Opening up to institutional investment means opening yourself up to ownership by a culture that demands infinite growth. In recent years this has gotten particularly bad; with the rise in interest rates, stocks can no longer deliver moderate growth and still be considered worthwhile investments. Everything is either a rocketship to the moon, or its a sell. Combine that with a string of US court cases that have interpreted tge law in such a way as to foster the belief that its illegal for companies to put anything ahead of shareholder value, and what you get is a top down imperative to squeeze the maximum profit out of everything. When you see Microsoft mulling over ideas like putting ads in your start menu, or EA talking about in-game advertising, this is why. When you see Spotify raising prices multiple times while crowing about how their content production costs are basically non-existent and changing their contracts so that smaller artists literally don't get paid for their music, this is why.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 0 points 5 months ago

They did spend the last few years screwing over any customer that wasn't some giant corporation on a product that was originally created as a low cost tool for educational purposes.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Because the more commercial they get, the more they stray from their original purpose as a charity to provide low-cost machines for kids to learn about computer science.

First there was the Dynabook, then OLPC, then Raspberry Pi, and now we've basically got to start over yet again because enshittification is imminent.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm willing to bet they'll start adding telemetry features in RPiOS for "quality purposes" a few years from now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (4 children)

And so begins "Line must go up" and the inevitable enshittification .

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] impure9435@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

As long as Raspberry Pi doesn't start ripping off their customers, I will happily stay with them. Most other SBCs are made by Chinese companies, which I definitely won't buy. Hell no, I'm not supporting the Chinese economy.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As long as Raspberry Pi doesn't start ripping off their customers

Give it 2 weeks (max) after the IPO

Hell no, I'm not supporting the Chinese economy.

Lol, I agree with you, but realistically you probably have only avoided a fraction of Chinese made crap

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I don't so much care where it's made. The real selling point, to me, for Pi is that their products are well documented, in English, and solutions for problems are easily googled. There's tons of SBCs out there, some of them even inexpensive, but I can't tell if any are going to last longer than a single production run. Meanwhile, I can still buy a Pi 3 after almost a decade. Or I can take the hat I made for a Pi3, plug it straight into a new Pi Zero, and expect it to work without changes.

IPO is a big step down the path to enshittification, especially when there's no clear, dominant alternative.

[–] StaySquared@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Oh jees... welp it was great while it lasted.

load more comments
view more: next ›