this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
171 points (98.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
638 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Currently I'm using Joplin with Syncthing-backed file system synchronization. I'm pretty pleased with it, as I do like tagging- and Markdown-based systems.

I plan to upgrade to server-based synchronization, but before doing that, however, I wanted to see what other people are using.

Edit: So far I see a slight favor towards Joplin and Logseq, but I totally didn't expect (and appreciate) getting so many different answers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Librem 5. I absolutely love it but also recognize it isn't for everyone, yet.

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That thing looks really interesting, I've only two problems from a first glance:

  • I'm not informed on mobile CPUs, the thing looks fine, but aren't 3 GB RAM not way too less these days? I mean my cheap ass 150€ wiko phone has six

  • I get it that companys like that one have smaller margins than big tech, but 1000 $ for that phone? Why does not a single of these FOSS/privacy/degoogle companies offer a budget phone around 300 bucks? I don't need a device that runs crysis in 4K, I just want to communicate, browse the web, answer mails, and take okayish photos on something different than big tech spyware.

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

The first point probably comes down to time. When they designed the phone, RAM was more expensive and phones came with 1-2-4 gigs.

The second one is manufacturing cost. If they could sell at least a few million units, it would be way cheaper.