this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
86 points (96.7% liked)
Asklemmy
43984 readers
709 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Honestly? They have limited resources, so they have to prioritize the most important supplies. While you'd think keeping your soldiers in good shape is important, it may be less important than making sure the artillery units are getting their regular shipments of shells, stuff like that.
Especially if those "soldiers" are just some cannon fodder you recruited from a prison and sent to the front with no training. They probably won't live long, and you're not expecting them to, so it becomes a waste to spend resources maintaining them.
Also, there might be some corruption at play. Rather than explain that myself, I'll let Perun field it:
https://youtu.be/i9i47sgi-V4?si=nym2bddLZ1BW6zmL
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/i9i47sgi-V4?si=nym2bddLZ1BW6zmL
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.