this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

WetShaving

720 readers
14 users here now

This is a community of enthusiasts, hobbyists and artisans who enjoy a traditional wet shave: brush, soap, and safety or straight razor. We are a part of the WetShaving community found on Reddit, Discord, and IRC.

New subscribers welcome!

Please visit our wiki, which is always and forever a work in progress.

๐Ÿช’ Check out these alternative front-ends for this server:

https://gem.wetshaving.social/ - a nice modern interface

https://old.wetshaving.social/ - designed to look like old.reddit.com

Our sister Mastodon instance is https://wetshaving.social/.

๐Ÿช’ Track the uptime of our various services here:

https://uptime.splettnet.com/status/wetshaving

๐Ÿช’ Community Rules

Rule 1 - Behaviour and Etiquette
Rule 2 - Content Guidelines
Rule 3 - Reviews and Disclosure
Rule 4 - Advertising
Rule 5 - Inappropriate Content
Rule 10 - Moderator Discretion

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Are you new to the community? Have you been lurking and wondering how to jump in? Then you found the right place! Say hello, tell us about yourself, and talk about what you would like to learn.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] djundjila 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Not new to the community, but new to kamisoris and I'm very curious:

What's the deal with the asymmetric edge? Am I correct in assuming it's only meant to be used on one side? Is there any advantage I'm missing making up for the obvious downside?

Does anyone here prefer traditional asymmetric kamisoris over straights? If yes, why?

[โ€“] cmlael67@mastodon.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@djundjila @wetshavingadmin From what I understand, kamisoris were originally meant to be used by a person shaving someone else. The belief is that you can get a better, longer lasting edge with only one side beveled.

@cmlael67 @djundjila@sub.wetshaving.social
Makes sense if you're not meant to shave yourself ๐Ÿ‘

load more comments (3 replies)