this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
93 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6199 readers
2 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, my parents are pretty religious so I have to to fucking Bible study or some shit. Apparently homosexuality is immoral. Immoral my ass. With no authority whatsoever I can say FUCK RELIGON. Catholicism is bullshit.

Basically they were talking about "sexual immorality" started pressing them to provide detail. They rambled about how gay sex is immoral. And topped it off with "we should accept them still" yes Simon you daft bastard, you totally meant that last bullshit. I'm so tired of us being seen as abominations

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Studying the Bible is always a hilarious way to spend time, especially when you take a REALLLY good look at the part about man laying with another man. It seems it may have been edited well after the fact. I had recently heard something similar about the original hebrew word being that a man shall not lay with a boy, which if true would be more about outlawing pedophilia, but I haven't looked it up myself so I cannot verify the validity.

[–] ManyShapes@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

not a subscriber so cant read the article linked, but its not exactly "man shall not lay with boy", but "man shall not lay with male", which some posit (if i remember right) refers to a practice in ancient greece of "man" (a class, allowed to own property, etc) taking a male lover, often fairly young/underage. This is supported by it matching the language used in ancient greece, and all other shalls and shall-nots in the torah referring only to man and/or woman, not male/female.

Edit:

Found the passage, leviticus 20:13, forbids יש (man) from laying with זכר (male).

Edit 2:

Found the opinion piece

[–] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was mentioning two separate things. The article linked did indeed day man with male, but then proceeds to point out how it doesn't really fit with the rest of them, and yes it is very much opinion.

The other bit I had heard from a random podcast that was not at all about religion, and so while I find it interesting that they had heard it a different way, it's very much unverified as it's just word of mouth from random people and not language experts.

Random side note: I'm also not a subscriber and managed to get into the whole article.. I guess my pop up blocker isn't playing around these days.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One thing you learn when actually reading the bible is just how punishment heavy it is

Riding your horse to church? Fucking degenerate scum

Working on the Sunday? That's the death penalty

[–] iso@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

yeah I even remember some school board banning the bible because it is not appropriate to children