this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
550 points (97.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
334 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] red@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And that's trusting that whoever uploaded the track had a good quality source. And it's still double encoded.

[–] Pulp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any official uploads from recent years are going to be just fine. And if not then maybe their spotify upload is broken too

[–] red@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Hq is equivalent to 320kbps, noticably better than YT quality

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Well if you save the opus or aac it's only single lossy compression, not double unless the uploader used a lossy file as their input. But if that was the case, ripping mp3 would be triple lossy compression...