this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
150 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
4890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Today, a prominent child safety organization, Thorn, in partnership with a leading cloud-based AI solutions provider, Hive, announced the release of an AI model designed to flag unknown CSAM at upload. It's the earliest AI technology striving to expose unreported CSAM at scale.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 135 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not a single peep about false positives.

I'm sure it won't be abused though. And if anyone does complain, just get their electronics seized and checked, because they must be hiding something!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

It could also, of course, make mistakes, but Kevin Guo, Hive's CEO, told Ars that extensive testing was conducted to reduce false positives or negatives substantially. While he wouldn't share stats, he said that platforms would not be interested in a tool where "99 out of a hundred things the tool is flagging aren't correct."

I take this to mean it is at least 1% accurate lol.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 81 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Reminds me of the A cup breasts porn ban in Australia a few years ago, because only pedos would watch that

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 15 points 1 day ago

This sort of rhetoric really bothers me. Especially when you consider that there are real adult women with disorders that make them appear prepubescent. Whether that's appropriate for pornography is a different conversation, but the idea that anyone interested in them is a pedophile is really disgusting. That is a real, human, adult woman and some people say anyone who wants to live them is a monster. Just imagine someone telling you that anyone who wants to love you is a monster and that they're actually protecting you.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There was a a porn studio that was prosecuted for creating CSAM. Brazil i belive. Prosecutors claimed that the petite, A-cup woman was clearly underaged. Their star witness was a doctor who testified that such underdeveloped breasts and hips clearly meant she was still going through puberty and couldn't possible be 18 or older. The porn star showed up to testify that she was in fact over 18 when they shot the film and included all her identification including her birth certificate and passport. She also said something to the effect of women come in all shapes and sizes and a doctor should know better.

I can't find an article. All I'm getting is GOP trump pedo nominees and brazil laws on porn.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 4 points 19 hours ago

I'm just glad they protected her

Pretty sure the adult star was lil Lupe. She was everywhere at the time because she did, indeed, look underage.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Awe man, I love all titties. Variety is the spice of life.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not to mention the self image impact such things would have on women with smaller breasts, who (as I understand it) generally already struggle with poor self image due to breast size.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clearly the state gives zero fucks about these women, or anyone else or even "the children"

Catholic Church is still around for a reason

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Typically the state only cares about things they perceive as children.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, straight to jail.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If this is the price I must pay, I will pay it, sir! No man should be deprived of privately viewing a consenting adults perfectly formed small tit's. They can take my liberty, they can take my livelihood, but they will never take away my boner for puffy nipples on a small chested half Japanese woman!

[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

What is the charge? Biting a breast? A succulent Chinese breast?

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Australia has a more general ban on selling or exhibiting hard porn, but is is legal to possess it. So it's not just small boobs.