3DPrinting

15625 readers

174 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
Do not create links to reddit
If you see an issue please flag it
No guns
No injury gore posts

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

andypiper@lemmy.world

henry_rowengartner@lemmy.world

j4k3@lemmy.world

GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee

Any recommendations for a low-cost, low-hassle printer? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Several years ago I leapt enthusiastically into the realm of 3D printing by buying a massive, expensive delta-type printer. I had to put it together myself, which was fun, but after that I struggled to get it to print well. Even simply trying to get the prints to stick to the bed were difficult, leading me to add huge brims to all my parts which were a pain to cut off afterward. Eventually I gave up fiddling with it and it’s been gathering dust ever since.

I know that a lot of you treat the hobby as an opportunity for endless tinkering and optimization, which is great, but I think I’ve realized that what I’d prefer is something that just works out of the box with a minimum of adjustment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think I would recommend the q1 pro over the x plus 3 since it's a difference in size by about 2 inches but saves a lot of money for the same components with a few upgrades even for leveling and the processor.

Though I really want the plus 4 but am waiting for the inevitable revisions for that price point.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The first gen 3 series machines definitely had some teething troubles, so waiting on the 4 is probably a wise plan.

Me, I'm mostly interested to see if they backport compatibility for their "Qidi Box" filament changer thingy (which thus far is vaporware in the first place) to also work with the Plus/Max 3. I don't care about multicolor printing that much so I'm not about to buy a new printer just for it, but if I can slap on an add-on I just might.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 2 days ago

Oof right?
I'd just love a filament box AMS that also has a dehydrate setting. But them releasing a backwards compatible option would be great. It's wild how far they have come since competing with flashforge.