this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
278 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39096 readers
3933 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hugh Nelson, 27, from Bolton, jailed after transforming normal pictures of children into sexual abuse imagery

A man who used AI to create child abuse images using photographs of real children has been sentenced to 18 years in prison.

In the first prosecution of its kind in the UK, Hugh Nelson, 27, from Bolton, was convicted of 16 child sexual abuse offences in August, after an investigation by Greater Manchester police (GMP).

Nelson had used Daz 3D, a computer programme with an AI function, to transform “normal” images of children into sexual abuse imagery, Greater Manchester police said. In some cases, paedophiles had commissioned the images, supplying photographs of children with whom they had contact in real life.

He was also found guilty of encouraging other offenders to commit rape.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

We aren't talking about a famous person.

We are talking about someone taking pictures of kids they know to have someone else turn it into CSAM.

The comparison you are trying to make is completely irrelevant. The fact that you see it as a comparison makes it even worse.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do famous people have certain exemptions? Fewer rights?

You can definitely say that them going around trying to get the pictures to begin with is stalking though. I pretty well didn't consider that step and was focused on the AI bit.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

The AI part is a continuation.

And this...

Do famous people have certain exemptions? Fewer rights?

Is completely irrelevant and ridiculous as a comment.

You are comparing a household name and likeness to a child that someone wants to sexually abuse, is near, and able to get pictures of.

Stop talking about celebrities and come on down to reality please.