Technology

59566 readers

3235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

175

Amazon announces first Kindle ever with color screen, retailing for $279 (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Brkdncr@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

123 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I still have an old Kindle and it still gets months of battery life. I occasionally read comics so this may get me to upgrade.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Uhh... What was the Kindle Fire? Wasn't that color, it was basically a very dumb tablet instead of a smart eReader?

Paperwhite is awesome, anyway. Great battery life. Perfect format. USB-C for charging, unlike the Oasis, seriously fuck you guys so hard for giving the Oasis microUSB, fuck you fuck you fuck you. Sometimes...you just need to know your lane & stay in it.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 12 points 1 month ago

The Kindle Fire was an Android tablet, not an e-reader. Completely different products.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My guess is that Amazon thinks everyone forgot about the Kindle Fire cuz that was before last quarter and that's as far back as they remember.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Amazon Fire wasn’t an e-Ink screen, it was LCD.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But it was still a Kindle though?

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. It was a completely different product. It's like trying to claim that an iPhone is an iMac because it has the "i" in the name and is made by the same company. Similar branding to help tie it together, but completely different devices.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

More like saying an ipod shuffle is an ipod...

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

In name, sure. But not really. It was Amazon trying to sell an Android tablet on the Kindle brand. It could read Kindle books using the same Kindle app as any Android device, but it was far more than an eReader and didn’t feature the eInk screen that makes eReaders worth reading on.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I have an older kindle. The micro USB is the only thing that really bothers me about it. It hasn't bothered me enough to upgrade, but it almost did the other day if they hadn't sold out and now jacked the price.