this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
344 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
4890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

But it was mostly just a show.

Attendee Robert Scoble posted that he’d learned humans were “remote assisting” the robots

Serious question: Wasn't it obvious?

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

There was some hate babbling when that robot taxi company in SanFran published that their autonomous cars were assisted by remote drivers who took over when situations were too complex for the robots.

I think remote support and steering will be the most reliable and practical way those tasks will be handled for the foreseeable future. How much assistance the cars will need may diminish but I don't think they will ever be able to work without any human assistance.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Sure they will, just put then on rails, make them bigger and available to the public, call it Public AI transport or something

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tele-Reliance Artificial Intelligence Network

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More like No Remote only Railiance AI Robo Taxi Network

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

N.R.O.R.A.I.R.T.N.? I think you missed the joke.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Oh it spells train, i might be overworked, took a while, lol

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Light rAIl transit.

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I think you're cooking here, maybe you can get a government grant to fund this

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

thats just regular driving with extra steps

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sort of. It just depends on how much the person needs to control the vehicle.

The easiest example I can think of: Imagine lorries traveling along a motorway, and they can do that autonomously because it's "easy", and when they get into a city a remote operator needs to drive them manually into the depot.

Each operator could easily drive 4 or 5 lorries, if only one of those is entering a city at a time. Instead of needing a driver per truck, you only need drivers for the maximum number of trucks that might be entering cities at the same time. For a fleet of 30, that could be 5 drivers.

For things like mining, where safety regulations mean that you want to avoid having people in the mine as much as possible, even having one driver for every haul truck (so yeah, regular driving with extra steps) could be economically profitable if it means you can reduce some other, potentially expensive safety controls.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

this would work mostly in the us where the majority of the time you are in wide highways. aside from that, i see how it can be useful.