this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
310 points (97.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35552 readers
758 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I changed out both elements in my electrc water back in late August. Had to change the bottom one out again today.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HollandJim@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (4 children)

But it’s a greenhouse gases contributor - electric is better. Check that anode commented below.

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anodes protect against corrosion. They don't do anything for hard water scale.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago

The active electronic ones may. I'll admit I don't know a lot about those.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably still would get issues with hard water though. OP needs a softener.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, water this hard should be fixed at the water treatment facility that provides his water. This much after just a couple of months is insane.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'd think a well owner would be a bit more informed about water purification.

[–] histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Lol I know people with a well and they never even knew they had a well they never had to touch it and never thought about it was the funniest shit when their pump went out and were confused why they didn't have water

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You would think that...

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Electric ain't better if you have to replace it constantly. Think of the emissions to produce these parts.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The emissions to produce a single heating element off a factory line are probably a lot smaller than keeping a jug of water in your house hot by burning natural gas off and on all day every day forever

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And that’s why you get an on demand unit. In either case, heating water in a jug over and over just so it might be hot hen you need it is not a great idea.

[–] Tayb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I agree. I use very little gas to heat my water for my hydronic system and the tap. I replaced an old oil hydronic heater and traditional electric water heater with a natural gas combi boiler that does both home heat and hot water. My utility bills went through the floor, and over the whole year I put a fraction of the CO2 into the atmosphere than I did in just a winter of the old oil furnace.

[–] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cool, when those heating elements are shipped over here via bunker fuel. I'll bet a boatload of those coming over is more emissions than running a NG burner for a decade

[–] protist@mander.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except it's not a boat transporting one heating element, but thousands upon thousands of other things. To accurately quantify emissions you'll need to divide the ship's total emissions by the # of products on board, likely making transport emissions from a single heating element negligible and easily surpassed by burning methane in your house constantly every day forever

[–] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, thousands and of other products built to be as or more disposable than the first element that blew.

Why do the boats keep coming, filled to the brim with garbage you never actually needed?

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

And so we come to the eventual argument. An electric water heater is going to keep a jug of water in your house hot by running off and on all day forever. Where did that electricity come from?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In my case, a mix of fossil fuel and renewable resources that on the whole are significantly less carbon-intensive per unit of energy than straight up burning methane in my house

[–] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I bet you like nuclear.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish we had European style water heaters at the tap. But that's not safe. You should see what I find in hospital infrastructure.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

Oh I used to work at a hospital that was built in the 60s and know full well what sort of asbestos-laden Frankenstein's monster they become over time

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Where did that electricity come from?

Please stop the climate denier arguments. Even if it was a gas power plant, it would be still more efficient than your little home gas heater and this gap gets wider and wider when we add more and more renewables to the energy mix.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A lot of the electricity probably came from burning natural gas at the power plant, and then some of that (~5%) gets lost in transmission. If we assume the natural gas plant is 60% efficient at turning gas into electricity, then an electric heating element in a hot water tank at your house would be about 55% efficient.

A typical gas furnace is about 80% efficient at turning gas into hot fluid, and a good one can reach 95% efficiency.

Depending on the fuel mix of your local grid, there's a good chance that burning natural gas at home will result in less pollution than using electric resistance heaters, either for heating water or the air inside your home during winter. Places like Washington state that generate most of their electricity from hydroelectric power plants will be exceptions.

However, heat pumps can be higher than 100% efficiency. They don't use electricity to generate heat, they just move heat from one place to another. You'll produce fewer emissions overall by using an HVAC heat pump to heat your house, and a heat pump water tank for hot water. Even if you live in a place like Canada, you can reduce emissions by installing a dual-fuel system that will use electricity to run the heat pump weather permitting, and fall back to using gas when the outdoor temperature goes too far negative.

Using heat pumps to move heat from outside, to inside your house, to inside your hot water tank is more efficient than using gas to heat your home and water, even when the electricity to run the heat pump is generated by burning natural gas.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I don't own a home but if I ever do I would love to put in a heat pump and solar panels. Great detailed response.

[–] DempstersBox@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll quit using gas the day shipping vessels go back to being fucking wind powered

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks for sharing - this is wicked. It's strange that it has taken so long, but it's very cool that we're possibly seeing a return to wind power, and this looks WILD to boot.