this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
29 points (96.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40438 readers
433 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'd like to host my own container images centrally in my network so that I can both cache the images (if dockerhub or similar goes down) but also host my own images that I don't want public. Anyone doing this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I looked into that at one point, but 15$/month is quite steep just for that ( imo )

[–] ogarcia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Well, if you want private images it is normal that they charge you for it. What I advise you to do is to make the images public and mount the private part as a volume. This way you can upload the images wherever you want without worrying.

Another option if you want the resulting image to have something private is to create as much as you can in a public image and have a script that adds the private part as the last layer.