this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
270 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39096 readers
4349 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Police have shot and killed a polar bear that came ashore in northwestern Iceland, the first sighting of a polar bear there since 2016. It might have hitched a ride from Greenland on a floating iceberg.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and those people all have guns to shoot polar bears.

https://www.sysselmesteren.no/en/weapon/

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That says you're supposed to scare them off first. Shooting them is a last resort. Not the first resort. In Iceland they made it the first resort by law. That's the issue.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Got it. As long as the children have a way of scaring off the hungry polar bear when it gets to the school playground, no worries.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Presumably that's the responsibility of adults.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I see, so post multiple guards around any place children might be just in case the rare polar bear makes landfall on Iceland so it can get scared away instead of mauling children.

Very reasonable.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do the Scandinavians do recess? Surely they do and they don't have a magic no polar bear fence. These are solved problems.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes. They solve it by shooting the polar bears.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Obviously there's more to it than that. The literal government website you linked requires non lethal means to be carried.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes. When they're not near a settled area. This should be fucking obvious.

Still waiting for you to provide evidence that there were no other houses around. Or are you going to repeat "summer home" again as if it's the Unabomber's shack in the woods when the weather is warm?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I see. This has all been one massive troll. Well, congratulations.

[–] Twiglet@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So you want a non-native animal with no suitable habitat and no food source other than humans to be given special preferential treatment over the humans that happen to live there, allowing it to roam and maul at it's leisure while people politely try to shoo it away from the child buffet?

You have zero context and zero knowledge of the situation, the country or that environment but sit there on your high horse pretending to be morally superior to the people in actual mortal danger.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They are not in any more danger than other places that live with polar bears. That's the point. They have the same situation but a different, worse, standard for dealing with it.

Also it's a bear, it can fish on the coasts, in rivers, and hunt other animals just fine. It's not some horror movie monster just coming after people.

[–] Twiglet@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Polar bears aren't native there, and you have no idea what the natural area is like. It's an island built on fishing, all the towns are on the coast, where the bears would like to hunt. Polar bears don't live there, because it's not an environment that can sustain them, and the biggest native wild animal is the arctic fox. Rest is all farm animals with some reindeer introduced to the highlands in the 70's for game/sport hunting.

You're arguing from pure ignorance.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Lmao. Pure ignorance, from the "just shoot them all" crowd. Excuse me if I don't accept that there's no other possible way to deal with the problem.