Technology

59566 readers

3371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Google results insist a Bugsnax sequel is coming out next month, but there's one small problem: Its devs aren't making one (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 2 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Getting your game noticed is a tricky business when you have to punch through the noise of the more than 10,000 new Steam games releasing each year. Young Horses, the developer of Bugsnax and Octodad, have found itself in an even trickier spot: Thanks to Google, people are expecting a Bugsnax sequel that doesn't exist.

"We are not working on a Bugsnax sequel right now and I need AI bs to stop telling kids we are based on a wiki ideas fanfic," Young Horses co-founder and president Philip Tibitoski tweeted earlier today. It turns out, through the wonders of algorithmic search result curation, Google's featured snippets have been informing people that Bugsnax 2 will be releasing in October 2024, despite the fact that neither Young Horses or any other developer are making it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yet another "AI bad" post that I can't replicate. Not that I'm defending Google, they've been shit ever since they removed "do no evil" from their strategy, but this is silly. It takes two seconds to verify the top auto generated result when you search something, you literally just have to scroll to the second and third results. If you just take the autogenerated answer (I'm feeling lucky?) without doing any verifying then someone failed you when it comes to doing online research. And for what it's worth, within hours of this issue being discovered, it was corrected by the same system that made the erroneous claim in the first place.

[–] SpaceMan9000@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

The problem is that it only gets fixed when people talk about it en masse. Saying it's fixed when it keeps making the same mistakes is misleading.