this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
4578 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
1
US: Alaska man busted with 10,000+ child sex abuse images despite his many encrypted apps (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deello@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Recent events have taught me that only individual chats are encrypted*. Group chats don't have that feature.

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In telegram nothing is e2e encrypted unless you specifically ask it to be and when you do, it kills all the functionality that makes it better than others.

[–] Deello@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

That's what I said. The person I replied to said that all messages are encrypted* with the asterisk being only if you specifically enable it. I clarified that it doesn't apply to group chats though. I don't use Telegram so the loss of functionality is actually a bigger deal to me than the argument around E2EE. Can you explain what features are lost when you enable it? It's a messaging app so I'm curious what you sacrifice for E2EE.